Martin v. State, 832 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Martin v. State, 832 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Troy MARTIN
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D02-2471.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 26, 2002.
Published opinion
832 So. 2d 943
2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19158
2002 WL 31870572
Troy Martin, in proper person., Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, and Erin K. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Cope, Gersten, Shewn.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Troy Martin appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, wherein defendant-appellant Martin asserts newly discovered evidence. The motion fails to set forth what the evidence was in the defendant’s case, and how the[*944] claimed newly discovered evidence would have affected the outcome, if at all. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant to file an amended motion.

Affirmed.