Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“[a]n out-of-court statement made after the completion of a criminal act is not admissible under the state of mind exception as to the intent or motive underlying that completed act”
- State v. Freeney, 637 A.2d 1088 (Conn. 1994).published“[a]n out-of-court statement made after the completion of a criminal act is not admissible under the state of mind exception as to the intent or motive underlying that completed act”
- State v. Soto, 757 A.2d 1156 (Conn. App. Ct. 2000).published“[a]n out-of-court statement made after the completion of a criminal act is not admissible under the state of mind exception as to the intent or motive underlying that completed act”
Other citing cases
- PMG Land Assocs., L.P. v. Harbour Landing Condo. Ass'n, 42 A.3d 508 (Conn. App. Ct. 2012).published
- State v. Cobb, 743 A.2d 1 (Conn. 1999).published
- Maguire v. Maguire, 608 A.2d 79 (Conn. 1992).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Harold Holloway
v.
Harold Holloway
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 29, 1990.
Published opinion
William F. Gallagher, special public defender, in support of the petition., Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (2) · Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 265, is denied.