State v. Holloway, 576 A.2d 547 (Conn. 1990). · Go Syfert
State v. Holloway, 576 A.2d 547 (Conn. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“[a]n out-of-court statement made after the completion of a criminal act is not admissible under the state of mind exception as to the intent or motive underlying that completed act”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed
  • State v. Freeney, 637 A.2d 1088 (Conn. 1994).published
    “[a]n out-of-court statement made after the completion of a criminal act is not admissible under the state of mind exception as to the intent or motive underlying that completed act”
  • State v. Soto, 757 A.2d 1156 (Conn. App. Ct. 2000).published
    “[a]n out-of-court statement made after the completion of a criminal act is not admissible under the state of mind exception as to the intent or motive underlying that completed act”
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Harold Holloway
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 29, 1990.
Published opinion
576 A.2d 547
1990 Conn. LEXIS 248
William F. Gallagher, special public defender, in support of the petition., Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (2) · Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 265, is denied.