Taylor v. State Bd. of Mediation & Arbitration, 747 A.2d 1 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Taylor v. State Bd. of Mediation & Arbitration, 747 A.2d 1 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada (conn, 2024-06-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada
Conn. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
We note that the Appellate Court has approved of the use of the McDonnell Douglas framework in the context of retaliatory discharge claims, brought pursuant to General Statutes § 31-226a, for retaliation against employees assisting former employees with the filing of claims for unemployment compensation; see Beizer v. Dept. of Labor, 56 Conn. App. 347 , 354–56, 742 A.2d 821 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 937 , 747 A.2d 1 (2000); in the context of 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 41 0 Conn. 1 ,0 43 Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada Federal case law similarly treats self-reporting as an ‘‘exc…
cited Cited "see" Bridgeport Dental, LLC v. Commissioner of Social Services
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Beizer v. Dept. of Labor, 56 Conn.App. 347 , 355, 357, 742 A.2d 821 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 937 , 747 A.2d 1 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
We also have approved of the use of the McDonnell Douglas Corp. framework in retaliatory discharge claims, pursuant to General Statutes §. 31-226a, for retaliation against employees assisting former employees with the filing of claims for unemployment compensation; see Beizer v. Dept. of Labor, 56 Conn. App. 347, 355-56 , 742 A.2d 821 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 937 , 747 A.2d 1 (2000); in retaliatory discharge claims, pursuant to § 31-290a, for the discharge of employees after they file for workers’ compensation benefits; see Otero v. Housing Authority, 86 Conn. App. 103, 108-109 , 860 A.2d…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arnone v. Town of Enfield
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Conn. 2000); see also Beizer v. Dept. of Labor, 56 Conn. App. 347, 355-56 , 742 A.2d 821 (in retaliatory discharge actions, Connecticut courts look to federal courts to determine allocations of burdens of proof), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 937 , 747 A.2d 1 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hefti v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 201 Conn. 350, 356 , 514 A.2d 749 (1986); see also Taylor v. State Board of Mediation & Arbitration, 54 Conn. App. 550, 555 , 736 A.2d 175 (1999) (although plaintiff filed appeal documents within forty-five day appeal period provided in § 4-183 (c), court correctly dismissed appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on ground that appeal documents not prop erly filed with court because no filing fee paid), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 925 , 747 A.2d 1 , cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1266 , 120 S. Ct. 2729 , 147 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THADDEUS TAYLOR
v.
STATE BOARD OF MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 10, 2000.
747 A.2d 1
2000 Conn. LEXIS 43
Thaddeus Taylor, pro se, in support of the petition., Richard A. Sponzo, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 550 (AC 17436), is denied.

KATZ and SULLIVAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.