Sciortino v. Town of Trumbull, 767 A.2d 1213 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Sciortino v. Town of Trumbull, 767 A.2d 1213 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a finding of contempt is a question of fact and our standard of review is to determine whether the court abused its discretion in finding that the actions or inactions of the party were in contempt of a court order.”
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Rewire the Board (alaska, 2001-12-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Rewire the Board
Alaska · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a finding of contempt is a question of fact and our standard of review is to determine whether the court abused its discretion in finding that the actions or inactions of the party were in contempt of a court order.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ARTHUR SCIORTINO
v.
TOWN OF TRUMBULL
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 7, 2001.
767 A.2d 1213
2001 Conn. LEXIS 51
Donald A. Browne, in support of the petition., Warren L. Holcomb, in opposition.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Alaska Supreme Court (1)

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 905 (AC 20327), is denied.