Shapero v. Mercede, 786 A.2d 430 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Shapero v. Mercede, 786 A.2d 430 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Shapero v. Mercede, 823 A.2d 1263 (Conn. App. Ct. 2003)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PAUL D. SHAPERO
v.
FRANK MERCEDE, JR.
SC 16628.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 27, 2001.
Published opinion
786 A.2d 430
2001 Conn. LEXIS 510
Brenden P. Leydon, in support of the petition., Neal L. Moskow, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 343 (AC 21230), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[*945] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16628. Brenden P. Leydon, in support of the petition. Neal L. Moskow, in opposition. Decided November 27, 2001

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s adoption of the referee’s report on the amount of attorney’s fees due the plaintiff?

“2. If the Appellate Court properly reversed the trial court’s adoption of the referee’s report, should the matter be remanded for a new trial?”