green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.2 score
“waiver consists of the 21 intentional abandonment or voluntary relinquishment of a known right.”
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nelson v. Preleski
waiver consists of the 21 intentional abandonment or voluntary relinquishment of a known right.
cited
Cited "see"
Lawrence v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Lawrence, 67 Conn. App. 284 , 786 A.2d 1227 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 919 , 791 A.2d 567 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dubose
State v. Green, 62 Conn. App. 217, 242 , 774 A.2d 157 (2001), aff'd, 261 Conn. 653 , 804 A.2d 810 (2002); see State v. Solman, 67 Conn. App. 235, 239 , 786 A.2d 1184 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 917 , 791 A.2d 568 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller
Compare Sandow v. Eckstein, 67 Conn. App. 243, 248 , 786 A.2d 1223 (2001) (finding untainted path to jury verdict because defect related only to one theory of liability, thereby leaving other paths unaffected), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 919 , 791 A.2d 566 (2002) with Monterose v. Cross, 60 Conn. App. 655, 661 , 760 A.2d 1013 (2000) (finding general verdict rule inapplicable because defect would impact jury’s consideration of both bases for liability).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE
v.
RIDGELY WHITMORE BROWN
v.
RIDGELY WHITMORE BROWN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 28, 2002.
Ridgely W. Brown, pro se, in support of the petition., Maureen A. Morgan, assistant bar counsel, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: D. Connecticut (1)
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 67 Conn. App. 183 (AC 20706), is denied.
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.