green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Melendez v. Valley Metallurgical Processing Co.
See Melendez v. Valley Metallurgical Processing Co., 266 Conn. 904 , 832 A.2d 64 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lovan C. v. Department of Children & Families
See Ahern v. Fuss & O’Neill, Inc., 78 Conn. App. 202, 209 , 826 A.2d 1224 (expert testimony required when question involved goes beyond field of ordinary knowledge, experience of judges or jurors), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 903 , 832 A.2d 64 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ingels v. Saldana
To allow such a claim to be raised on appeal “would be nothing more than a trial by ambuscade of the trial judge.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Monette v. Monette, 102 Conn. App. 1 , 18 n.3, 924 A.2d 894 (2007) (Schaller, J., concurring); see also Ahern v. Fuss & O’Neill, Inc., 78 Conn. App. 202, 214 , 826 A.2d 1224 (“a party cannot present a case to the trial court on one theory and then seek appellate relief on a different one”), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 907 , 832 A.2d 64 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ESTATE OF NOZARIO MELENDEZ
v.
VALLEY METALLURGICAL PROCESSING COMPANY, INC.
v.
VALLEY METALLURGICAL PROCESSING COMPANY, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 9, 2003.
Richard E. Gruskin, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 23921) is denied.