Est. of Melendez v. Valley Metallurgical Processing Co., 832 A.2d 64 (Conn. 2003). · Go Syfert
Est. of Melendez v. Valley Metallurgical Processing Co., 832 A.2d 64 (Conn. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Melendez v. Valley Metallurgical Processing Co. (connappct, 2005-01-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Melendez v. Valley Metallurgical Processing Co.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Melendez v. Valley Metallurgical Processing Co., 266 Conn. 904 , 832 A.2d 64 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Lovan C. v. Department of Children & Families
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ahern v. Fuss & O’Neill, Inc., 78 Conn. App. 202, 209 , 826 A.2d 1224 (expert testimony required when question involved goes beyond field of ordinary knowledge, experience of judges or jurors), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 903 , 832 A.2d 64 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ingels v. Saldana
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
To allow such a claim to be raised on appeal “would be nothing more than a trial by ambuscade of the trial judge.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Monette v. Monette, 102 Conn. App. 1 , 18 n.3, 924 A.2d 894 (2007) (Schaller, J., concurring); see also Ahern v. Fuss & O’Neill, Inc., 78 Conn. App. 202, 214 , 826 A.2d 1224 (“a party cannot present a case to the trial court on one theory and then seek appellate relief on a different one”), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 907 , 832 A.2d 64 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ESTATE OF NOZARIO MELENDEZ
v.
VALLEY METALLURGICAL PROCESSING COMPANY, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 9, 2003.
832 A.2d 64
Richard E. Gruskin, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 23921) is denied.