State v. Santos, 845 A.2d 409 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Santos, 845 A.2d 409 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (49 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Roberts (connappct, 2015-06-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Roberts
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Williams, 81 Conn. App. 1, 15 , 838 A.2d 214 (‘‘[a]lthough the prosecutor misspoke concerning the defendant’s testimony, when the isolated comment is read in context, it is clear that the jury reasonably would understand to what the prosecutor was referring’’), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 904 , 845 A.2d 409 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Samantha S.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Travis R., 80 Conn. App. 777 , 781 n.5, 838 A.2d 1000 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 904 , 845 A.2d 409 (2004). 4 On March 9, 2008, the respondent filed a petition for a declaratory ruling under the auspices of General Statutes § 4-176, a provision of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act; General Statutes § 4-166 et seq.; that establishes a procedure for an administrative agency to clarify the regulations it is charged with enforcing. 5 During oral argument on July 9, 2008, the following colloquy took place: “The Court: I want to know, are you, in fact, making a claim of fraud aga…
discussed Cited "see" In Re Christopher G.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Travis R., 80 Conn. App. 777 , 781 n.5, 838 A.2d 1000 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 904 , 845 A.2d 409 (2004). 9 The respondent asserted for the first time during the October 23, 2008 hearing that she never read or reviewed in their entirety with her attorney either the written affidavit of consent or the open adoption agreement.
cited Cited "see" Heussner v. Day, Berry and Howard, LLP
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alexandra v. Strong, 81 Conn. App. 68, 76-78 , 837 A.2d 875 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 906 , 845 A.2d 406 (2004).
cited Cited "see" State v. Morales
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Williams, 81 Conn. App. 1 , 18 n.4, 838 A.2d 214 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 904 , 845 A.2d 409 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Labow v. Labow
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Alexandru v. Strong, 81 Conn. App. 68, 79 , 837 A.2d 875 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 906 , 845 A.2d 406 (2004). 5 We accordingly conclude that the plaintiffs claim does not satisfy the requirements of the accidental failure of suit statute and that the court, therefore, properly dismissed the action.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Holliday
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Williams, 81 Conn. App. 1, 16 , 838 A.2d 214 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 904 , 845 A.2d 409 (2004). “[T]he prosecutor is expected to refrain from impugning, directly or through implication, the integrity or institutional role of defense counsel. ...
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
EDWIN SANTOS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 1, 2004.
845 A.2d 409
Richard E. Condon, Jr., assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Susann E. Gill, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 147 (AC 23766), is denied.