State v. Tunick, 959 A.2d 1011 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
State v. Tunick, 959 A.2d 1011 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
STEPHEN TUNICK
SC 18262.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 30, 2008.
Published opinion
959 A.2d 1011
2008 Conn. LEXIS 507
Richard Emanuel, in support of the petition., Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 109 Conn. App. 611 (AC 28461), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the defendant’s conviction, without first remanding the case to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether the trial judge had actively participated in pretrial negotiations?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

[*944] Decided October 30, 2008 Richard Emanuel, in support of the petition. Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.