Worley v. Peachtree City, 722 S.E.2d 363 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). · Go Syfert
Worley v. Peachtree City, 722 S.E.2d 363 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
313 Ga. App. at 626 Vacating opinion due to mootness of appeal3 citing cases2 listed here
  • Alan Hutzel v. State, 859 S.E.2d 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).published
    W., 313 Ga. App. 624, 626-627 (1) (a) ( 722 SE2d 586 ) (2012).7 (b) Obstruction of an officer.
  • St. Louis v. State, 763 S.E.2d 126 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).published 4 cites
    W., 313 Ga. App. 624, 627 (1) (b) ( 722 SE2d 586 ) (2012).
313 Ga. App. at 627 Vacating opinion due to mootness of appeal4 citing cases2 listed here
  • El-Fatin v. State, 771 S.E.2d 902 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).published 2 cites
    W., 313 Ga. App. 624, 627 (1) (b) ( 722 SE2d 586 ) (2012) (Conviction of loitering or prowling was authorized where the suspect’s explanation to a law enforcement officer could be read as an admission that he intended to frighten the victi…
  • St. Louis v. State, 763 S.E.2d 126 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).published 4 cites
    W., 313 Ga. App. 624, 627 (1) (b) ( 722 SE2d 586 ) (2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Worley
v.
Peachtree City
A10A0330.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jan 20, 2012.
Published opinion
722 S.E.2d 363
2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 39
Page Perry, David J. Worley, pro se., Sumner & Meeker, Theodore P. Meeker III, for appellee.
Adams.
Published
Adams, Judge.

In Scarbrough Group v. Worley, 290 Ga. 234 (719 SE2d 430) (2011), the Supreme Court found that the issues before this Court in Worley v. Peachtree City, 305 Ga. App. 118 (699 SE2d 94) (2010), were moot. The Supreme Court therefore reversed the judgment of this Court and remanded with direction that we vacate the judgment and dismiss the appeal as moot. In accordance with that decision, we therefore vacate our opinion in Worley v. Peachtree City, 305 Ga. App. 118, and make the Supreme Court’s decision the judgment of this Court. This appeal is therefore dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Mikell, P J., and Boggs, J., concur.