Dist. Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Fedco Sys., Inc., 508 A.2d 487 (Md. 1986). · Go Syfert
Dist. Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Fedco Sys., Inc., 508 A.2d 487 (Md. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Cited for
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DISTRICT MOVING & STORAGE, INC.
v.
FEDCO SYSTEMS, INC. and Gardiner & Gardiner, Inc.
No. 106.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
May 21, 1986.
Published opinion
508 A.2d 487
1986 Md. LEXIS 233
Browne L. Kooken of Upper Marlboro, for appellant., Steven M. Levine (Paul T. Cuzmanes and Wilson Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, on brief, for Fedco Systems, Inc., part of appellee and Gail A. Nettleton (Sadur & Pelland, on brief for Gardiner & Gardiner, Inc., other part of appellee) all of Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM

For the reasons stated in the well-reasoned opinion by Judge Bloom for the Court of Special Appeals in Dist. Moving & Stg. v. Gardiner & Gardiner, 63 Md.App. 96, 492 A.2d 319 (1985), the judgments are affirmed.[1]

JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED, WITH COSTS.

1

Additional support for the intermediate appellate court’s determination that the third-party beneficiary was bound by the contract arbitration clause in this case may be found in International Bro. of E. W., L.U. 308 v. Dave’s Elec. Serv., Inc., 382 F.Supp. 427, 429-30 (M.D.Fla. 1974); State v. Osborne, 607 P.2d 369, 371 (Alaska 1980); Zac Smith & Co. v. Moonspinner Condominium Ass’n, 472 So.2d 1324, 1324-25 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1985); Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc., 386 Mass. 187, 435 N.E.2d 628, 633 (1982); Syndor & Hundley, Inc. v. Wilson Trucking Corp., 213 Va. 704, 194 S.E.2d 733, 736 (1973); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 309(3) (1981); 17 Am.Jur.2d Contracts § 315 (1964 & Supp.1985).