green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
13.8 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 2008 · 2 courts ·
…he master is not a judge and is not vested with any part of the state's judicial power.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Flanagan v. Flanagan
with the introduction of 'no-fault' divorce based on a voluntary one-year separation ... or an involuntary separation ... the issue of constructive desertion as grounds for divorce rarely reaches this court.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Marcus J.
(2×)
he master is not a judge and is not vested with any part of the state's judicial power.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Wiegmann
(2×)
he master is not a judge and is not vested with any part of the state's judicial power.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wiegmann v. State
(2×)
he master is not a judge and is not vested with any part of the state's judicial power.
cited
Cited "see"
Karanikas v. Cartwright
See Lemley, supra, 102 Md.App. at 288 , 649 A.2d 1119 (“the court is not required to speak with children”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Malin v. Mininberg
Randolph, 67 Md.App. at 585 , 508 A.2d 996 . *430 But, “the chancellor who fails to provide at least some of the steps in his thought process- leaves himself open to the contention that he did not in fact consider the required factors.” Campolattaro v. Campolattaro, 66 Md.App. 68, 81 , 502 A.2d 1068 (1986); see Lemley, 102 Md.App. at 295 , 649 A.2d 1119 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Karmand v. Karmand
See also Lemley v. Lemley, 102 Md.App. 266, 300 , 649 A.2d 1119 (1994)(holding that an award of temporary or rehabilitative alimony may not be made unless the recipient spouse is not self-supporting and citing Hull v. Hull, 83 Md.App. 218, 220-221 , 574 A.2d 20 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Bosley
When exceptions to the report and recommendations of a master are filed, the chancellor must “exercise independent judgment to determine the proper result.” Domingues v. Johnson, 323 Md. 486, 496 , 593 *397 A.2d 1133 (1991); see also Lemley v. Lemley, 102 Md.App. 266, 277 , 649 A.2d 1119 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Skrabak v. Skrabak
See, e.g., Lemley v. Lemley, 102 Md.App. 266 , 649 A.2d 1119 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
Robert M. WOHLFARTH
v.
Robert M. WOHLFARTH
Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 7.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Dec 1, 1994.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Consent to Disbarment from the practice of law filed by Robert M. Wohlfarth, in accordance with Maryland Rule BV 12d2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 1st day of December, 1994
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Robert M. Wohlfarth be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Robert M. Wohlfarth from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule BV13, shall certify that fact to[*565] the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.