green
Positive treatment
Issue: separation of powers doctrineMD ↗
Issue: express equal protection clauseMD ↗
Issue: core principleMD ↗
Issue: medical malpractice claimMD ↗
Quoted verbatim 2×
19.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2007 ·
…courts do not substitute their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies, who are elected to pass laws.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Garrity v. Maryland State Board of Plumbing
ajn agency in the executive branch may ordinarily perform adjudicatory functions in harmony with the principle of separation of powers provided that there is an opportunity for judicial review of the agency's final determination.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Conaway v. Deane
(2×)
courts do not substitute their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies, who are elected to pass laws.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Frey v. Comptroller of the Treasury
Aggregates Ass’n v. State, 337 Md. 658, 673 , 655 A.2d 886, 893 (1995)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Tyler v. City of College Park
(2×)
Aggregates Assoc. v. Md., 337 Md. 658, 673 , 655 A.2d 886, 893-94 (1995).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lonaconing Trap Club, Inc. v. Maryland Department of the Environment
(2×)
Aggregates Ass’n v. State, 337 Md. 658, 675 , 655 A.2d 886, 894 (1995).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Neifert v. Department of the Environment
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
This standard of review is a paradigm of judicial restraint.” Maryland Aggregates Ass’n v. State, 337 Md. 658, 673 , 655 A.2d 886, 893 (1995) (quoting FCC v. Beach Communications, Inc., 508 U.S. 307, 313 , 113 S.Ct. 2096, 2101 , 124 L.Ed.2d 211 (1993)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wynn v. State
(2×)
Laws, Chap. 26, § 1. [2] See, e.g., Towson University v. Conte, 384 Md. 68, 95 , 862 A.2d 941, 957 (2004); Archer v. State, 383 Md. 329, 360 , 859 A.2d 210, 229 (2004); Attorney Grievance v. Roberson, 373 Md. 328, 345 , 818 A.2d 1059, 1069 (2003); MTA v. King, 369 Md. 274, 299 , 799 A.2d 1246, 1260 (2002); Post v. Bregman, 349 Md. 142, 163 , 707 A.2d 806, 816 (1998); Greco v. State, 347 Md. 423, 427 , 701 A.2d 419, 421 (1997); Maryland Aggregates v. State, 337 Md. 658, 678 , 655 A.2d 886, 896 (1995); Chertkov v. State, 335 Md. 161, 170 , 642 A.2d 232, 236 (1994); Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Watso…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Piscatelli v. Board of Liquor License Commissioners
Piscatelli also asserts that § ll-304(d)(2) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it treats liquor licensed establishments that offer entertainment differently from some other restaurants and hotels. “ ‘When social or economic legislation is at issue, the Equal Protection Clause allows the States wide latitude.’ ” Maryland Aggregates Ass’n v. State, 337 Md. 658, 672 , 655 A.2d 886, 893 (1995), quoting Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 440 , 105 S.Ct. 3249, 3254 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313, 320 (1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Goodwich v. Nolan
Maryland Aggregates Association v. State, 337 Md. 658, 678 , 655 A.2d 886, 896 (1995); Baltimore Import Car Service and Storage v. Maryland Port Authority, 258 Md. 335, 342 , 265 A.2d 866, 869 (1970); State Insurance Commissioner, supra, 248 Md. at 300 , 236 A.2d at 286 ; Heaps, supra, 185 Md. at 379 , 45 A.2d at 76 ; Hecht v. Crook, 184 Md. 271, 280 , 40 A.2d 673, 677 (1945).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Insurance Commissioner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
This Court has consistently held, however, that an administrative “agency in the executive branch may ordinarily perform adjudicatory functions in harmony with the principle of separation of powers provided that there is an opportunity for judicial review of the agency's final determination.” Maryland Aggregates v. State, 337 Md. 658, 678 , 655 A.2d 886, 896 (1995), and cases there cited.
cited
Cited "see"
Reliable Contracting Co. v. Maryland Underground Facilities Damage Prevention Authority
See Maryland Aggregates Ass’n v. State, 337 Md. 658, 675-79 , 655 A.2d 886 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re 2012 Legislative Districting of the State
See Maryland Aggregates Ass’n, Inc. v. State, 337 Md. 658 , 671 n. 8, 655 A.2d 886 , 893 n. 8 (1995) (quoting Murphy v. Edmonds, 325 Md. 342, 354-355 , 601 A.2d 102, 108 (1992)) ("[AJlthough the federal and state guarantees of equal protection are 'obviously independent and capable of divergent application,’ they are sufficiently similar that Supreme Court decisions applying the federal clause provide persuasive authority for this Court’s application of Article 24.”) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Frey v. Comptroller of the Treasury
See Maryland Aggregates v. State, 337 Md. 658, 678 , 655 A.2d 886, 896 (1995) (an administrative “agency in the executive branch may ordinarily perform adjudicatory functions in harmony with the principle of separation of powers provided that there is an opportunity for judicial review of the agency’s final determination”); Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of Assessments of Prince George’s County, 276 Md. 36, 46, 47 , 343 A.2d 521 (1975) (Article 8 of the Maryland Constitution “prohibits the courts from performing non-judicial functions and prohibits administrative agencies from performin…
cited
Cited "see"
Consumer Protection Division v. Morgan
See Maryland Aggregates, 337 Md. at 681 , 655 A.2d at 897 n. 14.
discussed
Cited "see"
Board of License Commissioners v. Toye
See Maryland Aggregates Ass’n v. State, 337 Md. 658, 678 , 655 A.2d 886, 896 (“Maryland’s courts have inherent power to correct agency adjudicatory determinations that are ... illegal.”), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 1965 , 131 L.Ed.2d 856 (1995); Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp., 274 Md. 211, 224 , 334 A.2d 514, 523 (1975) (“[W]hen an agency is acting in a fact-finding capacity (quasi-judicial) the courts review the appealed conclusions by determining whether the contested decision was rendered in an illegal ... manner.”); Board of Liquo…
discussed
Cited "see"
DeBusk v. Johns Hopkins Hospital
See Maryland Aggregates v. State, 337 Md. 658 , 673 n. 10, 655 A.2d 886 , 893-94 n. 10 (1995) (no merit to claim that legislation affecting a common law right should be subject to heightened scrutiny); Verzi v. Baltimore County, 333 Md. 411, 425 , 635 A.2d 967, 970 (1994); Murphy v. Edmonds, 325 Md. 342, 367 , 601 A.2d 102, 114 (1992); Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. Coupard, 304 Md. 340, 352 , 499 A.2d 178, 185 (1985); Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 485 , 90 S.Ct. 1153, 1161 , 25 L.Ed.2d 491, 501-02 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Erb v. Maryland Department of Environment
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Maryland Aggregates Ass’n v. State, 337 Md. 658, 686-88 , 655 A.2d 886 (1995); Maryland State Police v. Zeigler, 330 Md. 540, 559 , 625 A.2d 914 (1993) (“Procedural due process, guaranteed to persons in the State by Article 24 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, requires that administrative agencies performing adjudicatory or quasi-judicial functions observe the basic principles of fairness as to parties appearing before them.”); Department of Human Resources v. Thompson, 103 Md.App. 175, 197 , 652 A.2d 1183 (1995) (holding ALJ’s decision to preclude consideration of complainant…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ashton v. Brown
See Maryland Aggregates v. State, 337 Md. 658 , 671 n. 8, 655 A.2d 886 , 893 n. 8 (1995); Verzi v. Baltimore County, 333 Md. 411, 417 , 635 A.2d 967, 969-970 (1994); Murphy v. Edmonds, 325 Md. 342, 353-354 , 601 A.2d 102, 107 (1992), and cases there cited. .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
CCI Entertainment, LLC v. State
See, e.g., Maryland Aggregates Ass’n, 337 Md. at 673 , 655 A.2d 886 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Committee for Responsible Development on 25th Street v. Mayor of Baltimore
Washabaugh v. Washabaugh, 285 Md. 393, 404 , 404 A.2d 1027 (1979); see also Maryland Aggregates Ass’n v. State, 337 Md. 658 , 672 n. 9, 655 A.2d 886 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Holiday Point Marina Partners v. Anne Arundel County
See also Maryland Aggregates v. State, 337 Md. 658, 675-679 , 655 A.2d 886, 896 , cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 1965 , 131 L.Ed.2d 856 (1995), and cases there cited. 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Board of Education
See, e.g., Maryland Aggregates v. State, 337 Md. 658, 678 , 655 A.2d 886, 896 (1995); Medical Waste v. Maryland Waste, 327 Md. 596, 610 , 612 A.2d 241, 248 (1992);, Silverman v. Maryland Deposit, 317 Md. 306, 324 , 563 A.2d 402, 411 (1989); Cicala v. Disability Review Bd., 288 Md. 254, 260 , 418 A.2d 205, 209 (1980); Zion Evang.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keeler v. Mayor & City Council of Cumberland
(2×)
See also Maryland Aggregates Ass’n, Inc. v. State, 337 Md. 658, 682-686 , 655 A.2d 886 (1995), and cases there cited.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gilchrist v. State
See also Maryland Aggregates v. State, 337 Md. 658 , 671-672 n. 8, 655 A.2d 886 , 893 n. 8 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
Donna Carolyn ALDRIDGE
v.
Donna Carolyn ALDRIDGE
Misc. (Subtitle BV), No. 2.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Mar 22, 1995.
ORDER
This Court having considered the Joint Petition by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Donna Carolyn Aldridge, respondent, in which respondent consents to indefinite suspension from the practice of law, it is this 22nd day of March, 1995,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the respondent, Donna Carolyn Aldridge, is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in this State, and it is further,
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall certify the fact that Donna Carolyn Aldridge is indefinitely suspended to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Maryland Rule BV13.