Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rivers v. State
See, e.g., CSX v. Miller, 159 Md.App. 123, 204-08 , 858 A.2d 1025, 1072-74 (2004) (citing Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi AB, 178 F.3d 257, 262-63 (4th Cir.1999)) (upholding the admissibility of a physician’s “ ‘differential diagnosis,’ ... a scientific method that laymen would refer to as the process of elimination,” in diagnosing a patient in a tort action by the patient against his employer), cert. granted, 384 Md. 581 , 865 A.2d 589 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 387 Md. 351 , 875 A.2d 702 (2005); Hricko v. State, 134 Md.App. 218, 269-70 , 759 A.2d 1107, 1133-34 (2…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
v.
Donald E. MILLER
v.
Donald E. MILLER
No. 124.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Jun 7, 2005.
Stephen B. Caplis (Amy E. Askew, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, L.L.P., Baltimore, on brief), for petitioner., C. Richard Cranwell (H. Keith Moore, Cranwell, Moore & Bullington, P.L.C., Roanoke, VA, Guy M. Albertini, Albertini, Singleton, Gendler, Darby, Baltimore, on brief), for respondent., John Parker Sweeney, T. Sky Woodward, Meagan Newman, Miles & Stockbridge, Baltimore, Joe G. Hollingsworth, Stephen A. Klein, Robert E. Johnston, Spriggs & Hollingsworth, Robin S. Conrad, National Chamber Litigation Center, Washington, DC, George S. Tolley, III, Dugan Babij & Tolley, LLC, Timonium, amicus curiae.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM ORDER.
The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and argued, it is this 7th day of June, 2005,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.