Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Reinhardt, 49 A.3d 841 (Md. 2012). · Go Syfert
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Reinhardt, 49 A.3d 841 (Md. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the anti-csi effect instruction was fatally flawed for not advising the jury to consider the lack of forensic evidence in evaluating reasonable doubt.”
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Taylor v. State (mdctspecapp, 2018-04-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Taylor v. State (2×) also: Cited as authority (rule)
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the anti-csi effect instruction was fatally flawed for not advising the jury to consider the lack of forensic evidence in evaluating reasonable doubt.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Armstead
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the anti-csi effect instruction was fatally flawed for not advising the jury to consider the lack of forensic evidence in evaluating reasonable doubt
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
Richard J. REINHARDT
Misc. Docket AG No. 18.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Aug 6, 2012.
49 A.3d 841

ORDER

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition For Reprimand By Consent of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Richard J. Reinhardt, to reprimand the Respondent, it is this 6th day of August, 2012;

ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Richard J. Reinhardt, is reprimanded by consent for violating Maryland Lawyers’ Rule of Professional conduct 1.16.