Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Hickey, 61 A.3d 767 (Md. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Hickey, 61 A.3d 767 (Md. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: John Giza v. BNSF Ry. Co., 843 N.W.2d 713 (Iowa 2014)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 776 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Mark B. Harrison v. BNSF Ry. Co., 508 S.W.3d 331 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2014).published
    The regulation thus determines what is a reasonable ballast composition and size for a particular track. 13 Nickels, 560 F.3d at 431 ; see Lybrand, 2012 WL 1436690 , at *3 (―[T]he Court finds that Plaintiff‘s claims regarding the size and…
At page 792 cited at this page1 citing case
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
William F. HICKEY, III
Misc. Docket AG No. 40.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Feb 27, 2013.
Published opinion
61 A.3d 767
2013 WL 693213
2013 Md. LEXIS 130
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION of the parties’ Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 27th day of February, 2013

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, William F. Hickey, III, be, and he is hereby disbarred by consent, effective immediately, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall immediately strike the name of William F. Hickey, III, from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).