Reed v. Wellman, 177 N.W. 171 (Neb. 1920). · Go Syfert
Reed v. Wellman, 177 N.W. 171 (Neb. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mathiesen v. Kellogg (neb, 2024-02-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mathiesen v. Kellogg (2×)
Neb. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Reed v. Wellman, 104 Neb. 295 , 177 N.W. 171 (1920). 18 Schallenberg v. Kroeger, supra note 17 , 77 Neb. at 740 , 110 N.W. at 665 . 19 Id. 20 Hall v. Hall, 584 U.S. 59 , 138 S. Ct. 1118 , 200 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Schmid v. Simmons
Neb. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See, also, Krumm v. Pillard, 104 Neb. 335, 338-39 , 177 N.W. 171, 172 (1920) (“[w]hen the action is one purely legal in its nature, the rule is that either party ordinarily, as a matter of right, is entitled to demand a jury trial. . . .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Schmid v. Simmons
Neb. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See, also, Krumm v. Pillard, 104 Neb. 335, 338-39 , 177 N.W. 171, 172 (1920) (“[w]hen the action is one purely legal in its nature, the rule is that either party ordinarily, as a matter of right, is entitled to demand a jury trial. . . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Andrew J. Reed
v.
Thomas E. Wellman
No. 20759.
Nebraska Supreme Court.
Mar 13, 1920.
177 N.W. 171
1920 Neb. LEXIS 149
J. L. Rice and Lambe S Butter, for appellant., J. F. Ratcliff, C. E. Fldred and J. F. Cordeal, contra.
Day, Dean, Letton.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Dean, J.

In .this case the pleadings and the material issues that are involved are the same as those in Reed v. Wellman, ante, p. 292, that is decided at this sitting. In both cases the land of the defendants joins and is situated' hume diately north of plaintiff’s land. Ownership of a part of the strip in dispute is claimed by the defendant in this ease. The cases were consolidated and tried together in the district court, and on appeal they have been heard here and decided as one case. The decision in the former case controls in the present case.

The judgment of the district court is therefore reversed and the action is dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.”

Letton and Day, JJ., not sitting;.