Bill Stremmel Motors, Inc. v. Kerns, 531 P.2d 1357 (Nev. 1975). · Go Syfert
Bill Stremmel Motors, Inc. v. Kerns, 531 P.2d 1357 (Nev. 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BILL STREMMEL MOTORS, INC.
v.
JACK L. KERNS
No. 7326.
Nevada Supreme Court.
Feb 26, 1975.
Published opinion
531 P.2d 1357
1975 Nev. LEXIS 553
Petersen & Petersen, of Reno, for Appellant., John Frankovich, of Reno, for Respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury verdict, awarding actual and punitive damages for fraud.

[*111] Appellant made no motion for a directed verdict, NRCP 50(a), or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, NRCP 50(b), or for a new trial, NRCP 59(a). However, on appeal, appellant urges that the evidence fails to support the judgment. We will not consider this contention. See: Price v. Sinnott, 85 Nev. 600, 460 P.2d 837 (1969); NRCP 50(b), as amended in 1971.

Similarly, we decline to consider an objection first proffered on appeal concerning a jury instruction on burden of proof. NRCP 51; Fireman’s Fund Ins. v. Shawcross, 84 Nev. 446, 442 P.2d 907 (1968); Shoshone Coca Cola v. Dolinski, 82 Nev. 439, 420 P.2d 855 (1966).

Having considered appellant’s other contentions, we believe appellant has demonstrated no error, properly preserved for review, which affected substantial rights of the parties.