Fenerty v. Philadelphia Bar Ass'n, 332 U.S. 773 (1947). · Go Syfert
Fenerty v. Philadelphia Bar Ass'n, 332 U.S. 773 (1947). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951 1988 2026
Cited for
“any ground of substantive jurisdiction will serve to support an action, regardless of the formal amendments which may be necessary to make it triable on one side or the other of the Court”no pin page on record · 2 citing cases listed
  • Trentacosta v. Frontier Pac. Aircraft Indus., Inc., 813 F.2d 1553 (9th Cir. 1987).published
    “any ground of substantive jurisdiction will serve to support an action, regardless of the formal amendments which may be necessary to make it triable on one side or the other of the Court”
  • Koupetoris v. Konkar Intrepid Corp., 402 F. Supp. 951 (S.D.N.Y. 1975).published
    “any ground of substantive jurisdiction will serve to support an action, regardless of the formal amendments which may be necessary to make it triable on one side or the other of the Court”
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fenerty
v.
Philadelphia Bar Association
No. 298.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1947.
Published opinion
332 U.S. 773
1947 U.S. LEXIS 1892
John Boyle for petitioner., Henry R. Heebner for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 92%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · S.D. New York (1)

Certiorari denied.