Takahashi v. Fish & Game Comm'n, 333 U.S. 853 (1948). · Go Syfert
Search
Takahashi v. Fish & Game Comm'n, 333 U.S. 853 (1948). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Tolley (nc, 1976-07-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Tolley
N.C. · 1976 · signal: accord · confidence high
Otherwise stated, “due process of law” formulates a flexible concept, the purpose of which is “to insure fundamental fairness.” See Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 , 86 L.Ed. 1595 , 62 S.Ct. 1252 (1942); accord, State v. Hedgebeth, 228 N.C. 259 , 45 S.E. 2d 563 (1947), cert. granted 333 U.S. 854 , 92 L.Ed. 1134 , 68 S.Ct. 727 , petition dismissed 334 U.S. 806 , 92 L.Ed. 1739 , 68 S.Ct. 1185 (1948).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Takahashi
v.
Fish and Game Commission
No. 533.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 15, 1948.
333 U.S. 853
A. L. Wirin, Dean Acheson, Charles A. Horsky, Saburo Kido and Fred Okrand for petitioner., Fred N. Howser, Attorney General of California, for respondents. Briefs of amici curiae in support of the petition were filed by Attorney General Clark and Solicitor General Perlman for the United States; Lee Pressman and Frank Donner for the Congress of Industrial Organizations; and Thur-good Marshall and Marian Wynn Perry for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Supreme Court of California. Certiorari granted.