Marshall v. State Bar, 336 U.S. 951 (1949). · Go Syfert
Search
Marshall v. State Bar, 336 U.S. 951 (1949). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Central Eureka Mining Co. v. United States (cc, 1956-07-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Central Eureka Mining Co. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1956 · confidence medium
It also stated that where there exists authority for a taking of a type of property and the Government, as it did here, takes that property, the use by the Government of a means of acquiring that property, which means was not specifically spelled out by some specific statute, does not relieve the Government of the obligation of paying just compensation, citing, among others, the case of Edward P. Stahel & Co., Inc., v. United States, 78 F.Supp. 800 , 111 Ct.Cl. 682 , certiorari denied 336 U.S. 951 , 69.S.Ct. 878, 93 L.Ed. 1106 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marshall
v.
State Bar of California
No. 586.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1949.
336 U.S. 951
Petitioner pro se. Edward D. Lyman for respondent.
Published

Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.