Wilson v. Dist. Court, 111 A. 927 (N.J. 1920). · Go Syfert
Search
Wilson v. Dist. Court, 111 A. 927 (N.J. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HARRY M. WILSON
v.
DISTRICT COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT MONMOUTH COUNTY
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 15, 1920.
Published opinion
111 A. 927
1920 N.J. LEXIS 285
For the respondent, Charles F. O'oolc., For the appellant., Lloyd C. Biddle.
Affirmance, Aokerson, Bergen, Black, Chard, Chibe, Gardner, Heppeni, Ieimer, Iite, Iíalisch, Katzenbacpi, None, Pee, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Tren, Williams.
Published
Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. '' - ‘

For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Swayze, TreN-CHARD, BERGEN, IÍALISCH, BLACK, KaTZENBACPI, Wl-IITE, HePPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.