No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bestor
v.
Sardo
v.
Sardo
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia.
Oct 15, 1821.
Published opinion
At the trial Mr. Ashton, for the defendant,, To the admission of this evidence, Mr. Law, for the plaintiff,
Published
The Court,
however, (nem. con.) said that the spirit of the Act of Maryland, 1787, c. 9, respecting continuances, was, lhat the party applying for the continuance, should have the same benefit only which he would have had if the witness were.present j and permitted the defendant’s counsel to offer evidence to explain the fact of the possession being withheld of a portion of the premises.