Dulcie v. Guardian Transfer Storage Co., 84 U.S.L.W. 3477 (2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Dulcie v. Guardian Transfer Storage Co., 84 U.S.L.W. 3477 (2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“that a fourth amendment violation occurred does not nec- essarily mean that the exclusionary rule applies”
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Rolenc (nebctapp, 2016-08-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Rolenc
Neb. Ct. App. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
that a fourth amendment violation occurred does not nec- essarily mean that the exclusionary rule applies
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nannette DULCIE
v.
GUARDIAN TRANSFER STORAGE CO., INC.
No. 15–7513..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 29, 2016.
84 U.S.L.W. 3477
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: Nebraska Court of Appeals (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District denied.