United States v. Esquivel, No. 22-10084 (5th Cir. Oct. 25, 2022). · Go Syfert
United States v. Esquivel, No. 22-10084 (5th Cir. Oct. 25, 2022). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Esquivel
22-10084.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 25, 2022.
Unpublished opinion
Unpublished  |  Direct Criminal
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 22-10084
Summary Calendar FILED
October 25, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce
United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jose Ovidio Esquivel,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:21-CR-6-1

Before Southwick, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Jose Ovidio Esquivel pleaded guilty to possessing stolen mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708, and was sentenced to nine months in prison and three years of supervised release. Because the stolen mail found in his possession was addressed to only seven apartment units, Esquivel contends

*

Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. that the district court erred in applying a two-level sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(2)(A) for an offense involving 10 or more victims.

Even if the district court erred in applying the enhancement under § 2B1.1(b)(2)(A), however, any such error was harmless. The district court stated that, even if it were to sustain Esquivel’s objection concerning § 2B1.1(b)(2)(A), it would nonetheless vary upwards due to the extent of Esquivel’s conduct and sentence him to the same nine months. Any error, therefore, was harmless. See United States v. Guzman-Rendon, 864 F.3d 409, 411 (5th Cir. 2017).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.