In re Valderrama, 442 F. App'x 828 (4th Cir. 2011). · Go Syfert
In re Valderrama, 442 F. App'x 828 (4th Cir. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Rafael VALDERRAMA
No. 11-1136.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 11, 2011.
Unpublished opinion
442 F. App'x 828
Rafael Valderrama, Petitioner Pro Se.
Niemeyer, Shedd, Wilkinson.
Published

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Valderrama petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has recently resolved Valderra-ma’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has decided Valderrama’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[*829]terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.