United States v. Burgos-Flores, 195 F. App'x 551 (9th Cir. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Burgos-Flores, 195 F. App'x 551 (9th Cir. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee
v.
Pablo BURGOS-FLORES, aka Pablo Cesar Burgos-Flores, Defendant—Appellant
No. 05-50464.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jul 27, 2006.
Unpublished opinion
195 F. App'x 551
Becky S. Walker, Esq., Sandy Nunes Leal, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Gerson Simon, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Alarcón, Hawkins, Thomas.
Published

MEMORANDUM **

Pablo Burgos-Flores appeals from the district court’s judgment and 63-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for re-entry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Burgos-Flores’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.