No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Victor Manuel MATA-BARRERA
v.
Victor Manuel MATA-BARRERA
No. 07-51208.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 30, 2008.
Unpublished opinion
264 F. App'x 360
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Published
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor Manuel Mata-Barrera raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 285, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.