United States v. Zamudio-Gomez, 265 F. App'x 568 (9th Cir. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Zamudio-Gomez, 265 F. App'x 568 (9th Cir. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Ibis ZAMUDIO-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant United States of America v. Ibis Zamudio-Gomez
Nos. 07-30052, 07-30053.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jan 24, 2008.
Unpublished opinion
265 F. App'x 568
James E. Seykora, Esq., USBI—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Leo Sanford Selvey, Selvey Law Firm, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Published

MEMORANDUM **

Ibis Zamudio-Gomez appeals from the 138-month sentence imposed following his conviction on twelve counts, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Zamudio-Gomez contends that the district court’s denial of a three- or four-level downward adjustment for his role in the offense was clearly erroneous. We disagree and conclude that the district court did not clearly err in declining to apply more than a two-level downward adjustment. See United States v. Davis, 36 F.3d 1424, 1436-37 (9th Cir.1994); see also U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, cmt. n. 3-4.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.