v.
Cesar Martinez Chavez
Docket No. 37775
Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years, for conspiracy to recruit criminal gang members and conspiracy to supply firearms to a criminal gang and a consecutive five-year indeterminate sentence for conspiracy to intimidate a witness, affirmed.
Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Jordan E. Taylor, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.
Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;
and GUTIERREZ, Judge
PER CURIAM
Cesar Martinez Chavez pled guilty to Count I: Conspiracy to Recruit Criminal Gang Members, Idaho Code §§ 18-8504, 18-1701; Count II: Conspiracy to Supply Firearms to a Criminal Gang, Idaho Code §§ 18-8505, 18-1701; and Count III: Conspiracy to Intimidate a Witness, Idaho Code §§ 18-2604(3), 18-1701. The district court sentenced Chavez to concurrent unified terms of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years on Counts I and II and a consecutive five-year indeterminate term on Count III. Chavez appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing excessive sentences.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Chavez’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.