green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
J.G.G. v. Donald Trump
See, e.g., In re Att’y Gen., 596 F.2d at 68 (vacating a contempt finding against the Attorney General); Sawyer, 344 U.S. at 806 (vacating and dismissing as moot a contempt finding against prosecution.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education
In general, the lack of malicious intent or the presence of a good faith belief in the rectitude of one’s position cannot serve to “sterilize conduct otherwise contemptuous.” Babee-Tenda Corp. v. Scharco Manufacturing Co., 156 F.Supp. 582, 587 (S.D.N.Y.1957); See also, Land v. Dollar, 190 F.2d 623 (D.C.Cir. 1951), cert. dism. per mot. of petitioner 344 U.S. 806 , 73 S.Ct. 7 , 97 L.Ed. 628 (1952); Sucrs.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John Lloyd Taylor v. United States
Compare Land v. Dollar, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 190 F.2d 366, 379 , certiorari dismissed 344 U.S. 806 , 73 S.Ct. 7 , 97 L.Ed. 628 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arizona
v.
California
v.
California
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1952.
Fred O. Wilson, Attorney General of Arizona, Alexander B. Baker, Chief Assistant Attorney General, John H. Moeur, Burr Sutter and Perry M. Ling for complainant.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
A rule is ordered to issue, returnable within sixty days, requiring the defendants to show cause why leave to file the bill of complaint should not be granted.