green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sunbeam Corporation v. Richardson
See also S. Klein on the Square, Inc., v. Lionel Corp., 348 U.S. 860 , 75 S.Ct. 88 , 99 L.Ed. 677 , and Masters, Inc., v. General Electric Co., 348 U.S. 892 , 75 S.Ct. 215 , 99 L.Ed. 701 , dismissing appeals for want of a substantial federal question in cases from state courts holding constitutional fair trade acts, similar to that in the instant case. 6 In United States v. McKesson & Robbins, 351 U.S. 305 , 76 S.Ct. 937 , 100 L.Ed. 1209, 316 , in a case involving the McGuire Act, the court stated that it was not only bound by the limitations marked by Congress, beyond which price fixing may n…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sunbeam Corp. v. Richardson
See also S. Klein on the Square, Inc., v. Lionel Corp., 348 U.S. 860 , 75 S.Ct. 88 , 99 L.Ed. 677 , and Masters, Inc., v. General Electric Co., 348 U.S. 892 , 75 S.Ct. 215 , 99 L.Ed. 701 , dismissing appeals for want of a substantial federal question in cases from state courts holding constitutional fair trade acts, similar to that in the instant case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
S. Klein on the Square, Inc.
v.
Lionel Corporation
v.
Lionel Corporation
No. 326.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 25, 1954.
Sidney A. Diamond and Murray Gartner for appellant.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Appeal from the Court of Appeals of New York.
Per Curiam:The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.