Seymour Sales Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 348 U.S. 928 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Seymour Sales Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 348 U.S. 928 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States ex rel. Woodard v. Tynan (ca10, 1985-03-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States ex rel. Woodard v. Tynan
10th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Continental Oil Co., 215 F.2d 4 (10th Cir.1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 928 , 75 S.Ct. 341 , 99 L.Ed. 728 (1955). 2) A trial judge "called upon to determine whether grand jury transcripts should be released necessarily is infused with substantial discretion." Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 223 , 99 S.Ct. 1667, 1675 , 60 L.Ed.2d 156 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Tynan
10th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Continental Oil Co., 215 F.2d 4 (10th Cir.1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 928 , 75 S.Ct. 341 , 99 L.Ed. 728 (1955) 2) A trial judge "called upon to determine whether grand jury transcripts should be released necessarily is infused with substantial discretion." Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 223 , 99 S.Ct. 1667, 1675 , 60 L.Ed.2d 156 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cameron v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR FIRST JUD. D.
Colo. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
Remington Arms Co. v. Powers, 552 P.2d 1150 (Okla. 1976) (dictum); see also Williams v. Continental Oil Co., 215 F.2d 4 (10th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 928 , 75 S.Ct. 341 , 99 L.Ed. 728 (1955) (applying F.R.C.P. 34 to allow test of oil well to determine direction of drill hole, despite evidence that oil well shaft might collapse as result; result based on fact that test was only known method to determine true facts); Edwardes v. Southampton Hospital Association, 53 Misc.2d 187 , 278 N.Y.S.2d 283 (1967) (destructive testing of intermedullary pin in malpractice action allowed); Scully v…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Seymour Sales Co.
v.
Federal Trade Commission
No. 484.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 31, 1955.
348 U.S. 928
F. Joseph Donohue and Henry H. Koven for petitioners., Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, William J. Lamont, Earl W. Kintner and Robert B. Dawkins for respondent.
Published

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.