green
Positive treatment
published
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Cuvrell (In Re F & T Contractors, Inc.), 17 B.R. 966 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1982).published
- W. O. Bedal v. The Hallack & Howard Lumber Co., a Corp., & W. O. Bedal v. Oregon Short Line R.R. Co., a Corp., & Union Pac. R.R. Co., a Corp., 226 F.2d 526 (9th Cir. 1955).published
- Bedal v. Hallack & Howard Lumber Co., 226 F.2d 526 (9th Cir. 1955).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Neill
v.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
v.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
No. 105.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1955.
Published opinion
C. Richard Orieser argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner., Robert F. Ebinger argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were E. H. Burgess, Kenneth H. Ekin and Arvin J. Alexander.
Cited by 29 opinions | Published
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 812, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Per Curiam:The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the ease is remanded to the District Court with instructions to reinstate its order dated July 30, 1952.