Chiu But Hao v. Barber, 350 U.S. 878 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Chiu But Hao v. Barber, 350 U.S. 878 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Isadore Blumenfield v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Monte Perkins v. United States (ca8, 1960-11-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Isadore Blumenfield v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Monte Perkins v. United States
8th Cir. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Heasley v. United States, 8 Cir., 218 F.2d 86, 89 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 882 , 76 S.Ct. 134 , 100 L.Ed. 778 ; Rosen v. United States, 161 U.S. 29, 34, 40 , 16 S.Ct. 434 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chiu But Hao
v.
Barber, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 301.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1955.
350 U.S. 878
Joseph S. Hertogs for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff for respondent.
Published

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that the cause is moot.