neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.6 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co.
v.
Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. and United States v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc.
v.
Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. and United States v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc.
No. 125; No. 224.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
J. T. Suggs for the Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. et al., appellants in No. 125. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellants in No. 224.
Published
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Reported below: 138 F. Supp. 411.