discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Young See also Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 , 500 n. 2, 71 S.Ct. 857 , 862 n. 2, 95 L.Ed. 1137 (“petitioners themselves requested a charge similar to the one given, and under Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., would appear to be barred from raising this point on appeal”), reh’g denied, 342 U.S. 842 , 72 S.Ct. 20 , 96 L.Ed. 636 (1951), reh’g denied, 355 U.S. 936 , 78 S.Ct. 409 , 2 L.Ed.2d 419 (1958); United States v. Wiggins, 530 F.2d 1018, 1020 (D.C.Cir.1976) (“an invited error generally does not require reversal, i.e., appellant cannot now complain t…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Young See also Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 , 500 n. 2, 71 S.Ct. 857 , 862 n. 2, 95 L.Ed. 1137 ("petitioners themselves requested a charge similar to the one given, and under Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., would appear to be barred from raising this point on appeal"), reh'g denied, 342 U.S. 842 , 72 S.Ct. 20 , 96 L.Ed. 636 (1951), reh'g denied, 355 U.S. 936 , 78 S.Ct. 409 , 2 L.Ed.2d 419 (1958); United States v. Wiggins, 530 F.2d 1018, 1020 (D.C.Cir.1976) ("an invited error generally does not require reversal, i.e., appellant cannot now complain that the co…