Caudle v. United States, 356 U.S. 921 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Caudle v. United States, 356 U.S. 921 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Isadore Blumenfield v. United States of Am., (Two Cases). Monte Perkins v. United States, 284 F.2d 46 (8th Cir. 1960)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Caudle
v.
United States and Connelly v. United States
No. 738; No. 739.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1958.
Published opinion
356 U.S. 921
C. Arthur Anderson and John J. Hooker for petitioner in No. 738. Jacob M. Lashly, John H. Lashly, Paul B. Rava and Alan Y. Cole for petitioner in No. 739., Solicitor General Rankin, Roger Fisher and Carl H. Imlay for the United States.
Applications, Clark, Consideration, Douglas, Granted, Should, Took.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion the petitions should be granted. Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Reported below: 249 F. 2d 576.