green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kline Hotel Partners v. Aircoa Equity Interests, Inc.
See Bernstein v. United States, [ 256 F.2d 697 (10th Cir.1958), cert. dismissed, 358 U.S. 924 , 79 S.Ct. 296 , 3 L.Ed.2d 298 (1959) ]. ****** Applicable law, however, is not determined by the fine distinction between procedural remedies and remedial rights, for under the controlling conflicts rule as announced in Erie R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis & Randall, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
A. B., 291 F.2d 354, 363-365 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 890 , 82 S. Ct. 143 , 7 L.Ed.2d 89 (1961); Schere v. Christenberry, 179 F.Supp. 900, 905-906 (S.D.N.Y.1959); see also Bernstein v. United States, 256 F.2d 697, 702-704 (10 Cir., 1958), petition for cert. dismissed, 358 U.S. 924 , 79 S.Ct. 296 , 3 L.Ed.2d 298 (1959); Raser Tanning Co. v. N. L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
New York
v.
New Jersey
v.
New Jersey
No. 13.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1959.
358 U.S. 924
Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Ruth Kessler Toch, Assistant Solicitor General, for the State of New York, plaintiff. David D. Furman, Attorney General, and Charles J. Kehoe, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of New Jersey, and William S. Gaud for the American Express Co., defendants.
Published
The motion for leave to file bill of complaint is denied.