green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.6 score
“collateral estoppel by judgment is applicable only when it is evident from the pleadings and record that determination of the fact in question was necessary to the final judgment and it was foreseeable that the fact would be of importance in possible future litigation.”
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ammex, Inc. v. United States
collateral estoppel by judgment is applicable only when it is evident from the pleadings and record that determination of the fact in question was necessary to the final judgment and it was foreseeable that the fact would be of importance in possible future litigation.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Goldies, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Ct. 588, 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959). 6 *711 Petitioner puts heavy reliance on the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Dynamic Machine Co. v. NLRB, 552 F.2d 1195 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 827 , 98 S.Ct. 103 , 54 L.Ed.2d 85 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Hale Container Line, Inc.
See NLRB v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc., 257 F.2d 235, 239 (4th Cir.1958) (skilled employee not supervisor where managerial capacity limited to “the control [exercised by] a skilled worker over less capable employees ...”), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 911 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959). 20 .
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Elbert B. Whitt, Loyd Whitt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Commissioner v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 259 F.2d 231 , 260 (5th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. *1557 589, 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959); Treas.Reg. § 20.2033-1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Advanced Micro Devices v. Civil Aeronautics Board
See Pan American World Airways v. CAB, 261 F.2d 754 , 757 (D.C.Cir.1958) (“The Board ‘must find what the statute requires it to find, not in conclusory fashion in the statutory, language but in such fashion that a reviewing court can test the validity of the finding.’ ” (quoting American Airlines v. CAB, 235 F.2d 845 , 853 (D.C.Cir.1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 905 , 77 S.Ct. 668 , 1 L.Ed.2d 666 (1957))), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 590 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
Advanced Micro Devices, Data General Corporation, Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., Intel Corporation, Mostek Corporation, National Semiconductor Corporation, Rca Corporation, Rockwell International and Signetics Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor. Advanced Micro Devices, Data General Corporation, Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., Intel Corporation, Mostek Corporation, National Semiconductor Corporation, Rca Corporation, Rockwell International and Signetics Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor
See Pan American World Airways v. CAB, 261 F.2d 754 , 757 (D.C.Cir.1958) ("The Board 'must find what the statute requires it to find, not in conclusory fashion in the statutory language but in such fashion that a reviewing court can test the validity of the finding.' " (quoting American Airlines v. CAB, 235 F.2d 845 , 853 (D.C.Cir.1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 905 , 77 S.Ct. 668 , 1 L.Ed.2d 666 (1957))), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 590 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
Julien Andre Sasportes v. M/v Sol De Copacabana, Her Engines Etc. And Navexport, S.A., Banco De Credito Industrial, S.A., Star-Kist Foods, Inc., a Foreign Corp. v. M/v Sol De Copacabana, Her Engines, Tackle, Boilers Appurtenances, Etc., Banco De Credito Industrial, S.A., Banco De Credito Industrial, S.A. v. M/v Sol De Copacabana, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc. And Navexport, S.A.
See Hyman v. Regenstein, 258 F.2d 502, 513 (5th Cir. 1958), Cert. denied 359 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.
See discussion in Hyman v. Regenstein, 5 Cir. 1958, 258 F.2d 502 , cert. denied, 1959, 359 U.S. 913 . 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 .
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Security Guard Service, Inc.
See NLRB v. Griggs Equipment, Inc., 5 Cir. 1962, 307 F.2d 275, 279 , quoting NLRB v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc., 4 Cir. 1958, 257 F.2d 235, 239 , cert. denied 1959, 359 U.S. 911 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gordon v. United States
See Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 259 F.2d 231 (5 Cir. 1958), cert. den. 359 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 . (6) The value of one-half of the proceeds of the insurance policies as of the date of death of Daisy Wright, May 31, 1961, was $42,131.05, which amount was includable in her gross estate by reason of Section 2036 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. (7) The transfer made by Daisy Wright on April 12, 1947 was for a consideration within the meaning of Section 2043(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
discussed
Cited "see"
James J. Laughlin v. United States of America, Alan U. Forte v. United States
See Hyman v. Regenstein, 5 Cir., 258 F.2d 502, 510-511 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 913 , 79 S. Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959); see also Note, 52 Colum.L.Rev. 647, 663 (1952), and Comment, 65 Harv.L.Rev. 818, 842 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles M. Land, as Successor of the Last Will and Testament of John Robert Land, Deceased, United States of America v. Charles M. Land, Ernest H. Land and Margaret L. Haney, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Robert Land, Deceased
See Commissioner v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 5 Cir., 1958, 259 F.2d 231 , cert. denied, 359 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Land
See Commissioner v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 5 Cir., 1958, 259 F.2d 231 , cert. denied, 359 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Levi
See, e.g., Commissioner v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 259 F.2d 231 , 239 (5th Cir.1958), cert. denied 359 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bintliff v. United States
See also Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 5 Cir. 1958, 259 F.2d 231 , cert. denied, 359 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 ; accord Smith Engineering Co. v. Rice, 9 Cir.1938, 102 F.2d 492 , cert. denied, 307 U.S. 37 , 59 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bintliff v. United States
See also Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 5 Cir. 1958, 259 F.2d 231 , cert. denied, 359 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 ; accord Smith Engineering Co. v. Rice, 9 Cir.1938, 102 F.2d 492 , cert. denied, 307 U.S. 37 , 59 S.Ct. 1034 , 83 L.Ed. 1519 . 18 Mrs. Bintliff, jointly with her husband, pledged her second insurance policy to secure two bank notes, one for $100 and another for $1,400.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board
Compare NLRB v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc., 257 F.2d 235, 238 (4th Cir. 1958), cert. de nied, 359 U.S. 911 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 575 (1959) (machine printers not supervisors), with NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, George A. Angle, D/B/A Kansas Refined Helium Company, Intervenor. George A. Angle, D/B/A Kansas Refined Helium Company v. National Labor Relations Board
Compare NLRB v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc., 257 F.2d 235, 238 (4th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 911 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 575 (1959) (machine printers not supervisors), with NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chemical Bank New York Trust Company v. United States
See also Hyman v. Regenstein, 258 F. 2d 502, 511 (5th Cir. 1958), cert, denied 359 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959); Comment, Developments— Res Judicata, 65 Harv.L.Rev. 818, 842-843 (1952); Note, Collateral Estoppel by Judgment, 52 Colum.L.Rev. 647, 662-663 (1952); 1B Moore, Federal Practice (2nd ed. 1965), ¶ 0.442 [2], But see Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298, 338 , 77 S.Ct. 1064 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1356 (1957); Restatement, Judgments, § 68, Comment p. (1948 Supplement). 13 . § 9462.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hyman
v.
Continental Illinois National Bank
v.
Continental Illinois National Bank
No. 638.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1959.
Samuel H. Horne for petitioner., Floyd E. Thompson and Walter Humkey for respondents.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of International Trade (1)
C. A. 5th Cir.' Certiorari denied.