green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Niehouse v. State
See Smith v. State, 171 Tex.Crim. 313 , 350 S.W.2d 344, 347 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 883 , 82 S.Ct. 126 , 7 L.Ed.2d 83 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Settles v. United States
See Payne v. United States, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 94 , 96-97, 294 F.2d 723, 725-726 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 883 , 82 S.Ct. 131 , 7 L.Ed.2d 83 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerry Lane Jurek v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
See Smith v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 313 , 350 S.W.2d 344 (1961), cert. denied 368 U.S. 883 , 82 S.Ct. 126 , 7 L.Ed.2d 83 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Crews v. United States
See United States v. Edmons, supra. Hence, in my view the majority’s reliance on Bond v. United States, D.C.App., 310 A.2d 221 (1973), and Payne v. United States, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 94 , 294 F.2d 723 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 883 , 82 S.Ct. 131 , 7 L.Ed.2d 83 (1961), is misplaced since neither of those cases involved a sham or pre-textual arrest.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nunley
See Ward v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, 5 Cir., 265 F.2d 75, 80 , reversed on other grounds, 362 U.S. 396 , 80 S.Ct. 789 , 4 L.Ed.2d 820 , the case was decided by this Court under Rule 73, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., the civil counterpart of Rule 37(a)(2), F.R.Cr.P. * * -X- * * •* Reynolds v. United States, C.A.5th (1961), 288 F.2d 78 [1], n. 1, certiorari denied (1961), 368 U.S. 883 , 82 S.Ct. 127 , 7 L.Ed.2d 83 , rehearing denied (1961), 368 U.S. 917 , 82 S.Ct. 197 , 7 L.Ed.2d 133 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bailey v. United States
(2×)
See Payne v. United States, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 94 , 96, 294 F.2d 723, 725 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 883 , 82 S.Ct. 131 , 7 L.Ed.2d 83 (1961); and United States v. Bonds, 422 F.2d 660, 664 (8th Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Margeson
See Payne v. United States, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 94 , 294 F.2d 723 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 883 , 82 S.Ct. 131 , 7 L.Ed.2d 83 (1961); Bell v. United States, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 169 , 280 F.2d 717 (1960); Manucy v. United States, 272 F.2d 201 (5th Cir. 1960); Green v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 23 , 259 F.2d 180 (1958); United States v. One 1951 Cadillac Coupe, 139 F.Supp. 475 (E.D.Pa.1956).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas G. Edwards v. United States
See Payne v. United States, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 94 , 294 F.2d 723 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 883 , 82 S.Ct. 131 , 7 L.Ed.2d 83 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. State
See also Smith v. State, 171 Tex.Crim. 313 , 350 S.W.2d 344, 346 , cert denied, 368 U.S. 883 , 82 S.Ct. 126 , 7 L.Ed.2d 83 (1961); Johnson v. State, 169 Tex.Crim. 612 , 336 S.W.2d 175, 179-80 , cert denied, 364 U.S. 927 , 81 S.Ct. 355 , 5 L.Ed.2d 267 (1960). 10 Hilliard v. State Hilliard v. State, 513 S.W.2d 28 (Tex.Crim.App.1974), is a crucial case in understanding the felony murder rule in Texas under articles 42 and 1256 11 of the 1925 Penal Code, and is important to our later discussion of the merger doctrine.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sides
v.
Colorado
v.
Colorado
No. 519.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1961.
368 U.S. 883
Petitioner pro se. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and J. F. Brauer, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Published
Supreme Court of Colorado. Certiorari denied.