green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert's Waikiki U-Drive, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.
pjlaintiff must show that, whether or not then known to the conspirators, plaintiff's affected operation was actually in the area which it could reasonably be foreseen would be affected by the conspiracy
cited
Cited "see"
Rosario v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tomas Rosario, Ovidio Vega and Ray Cabel, Cross-Appellants v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10, I.L.G.W.U., Cross-Appellee, and Abe Dolgen, Individually and as Manager of Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10, I.L.G.W.U., Tomas Rosario, Ovidio Vega and Ray Cabel, Cross-Appellants v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10, I.L.G.W.U., Cross-Appellee, and International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964). 14 The general principles governing a fee award to a party who has prevailed on some claims but been unsuccessful on others were recently set forth by the Supreme Court in Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 , 103 S.Ct. 1933 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Exhibitors' Service, Inc. v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 224 (9th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964), the only Ninth Circuit case to deal with expert fees as costs, held that accounting fees are not recoverable.
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Costa Lines, Inc.
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 215 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnny L. Spain v. Louis Mountanos, and Kenneth Cory, Controller, of the State of California
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross
Accord, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 224 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Perryton Wholesale, Inc., a Corporation v. Pioneer Distributing Company of Kansas, Inc., a Corporation
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 9 Cir., 328 F.2d 190, 221 , certiorari denied 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 . 11 . 15 U.S.C. § 14 . 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick v. City of Portland
Photocopying Costs Photocopying costs are recoverable to the extent that the copies were “necessarily obtained for use in the case.” 28 U.S.C. § 1920 (4); see also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 224 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Haagen-Dazs Company, Inc. Pillsbury Company v. Double Rainbow Gourmet Ice Creams, Inc. Two Count Company, Inc.
Moreover, the Local Rules of the Northern District of California (“Local Rules”) allow, as taxable costs, “[t]he cost of reproducing documents obtained [in discovery] and used for any purpose in the case.... ” Local Rules App. A, ¶ V(B); see also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 224 (9th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964) (upholding award of photocopying costs).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rivera v. City of Riverside
See also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rivera v. City of Riverside
See also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964). 9 In Kerr, this court listed twelve factors for the district court to consider in setting attorney's fees awards. 4 The record must "demonstrate that the district court considered the factors established by Kerr." Kessler v. Associates Financial Services Company of Hawaii, Inc., 639 F.2d 498, 500 (9th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramos v. Lamm
See also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964), which lists nine criteria that trial courts should consider in determining reasonable antitrust attorney fee awards.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dowdell v. City of Apopka, Fla.
See, e. g., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964); Hugney v. Consolidation Coal Co., 59 F.R.D. 258 (D.Pa.1973); Sperry Rand Corp. v. A-T-O, Inc., 58 F.R.D. 132 (D.Va.1973). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendel Schwimmer D/B/A Supersonic Electronics Co. v. Sony Corporation of America and Sony Corporation
Contreras v. Grower Shipper Assn. of Central California, 1971 Trade Cas. ¶73,592 (N.D.Cal.1971), aff’d per curiam, 484 F.2d 1346 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 932 , 94 S.Ct. 1445 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974); see also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190 , 220 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964), discussing, Karseal Corp. v. Richfield Oil Corp., 221 F.2d 358, 362 (9th Cir. 1955).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kurt Strauss v. Douglas Aircraft Co.
See also Twentieth Century Fox v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190 , 214-215 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dixie Portland Flour Mills, Inc.
v.
Byrd
v.
Byrd
No. 254.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1964.
George P. Bowie and John S. Carriger for petitioner. H. Keith Harber for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D. Hawaii (1)
Court, of Appeals of Tennessee. Certiorari denied.