green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.0 score
“the rule is not applied in cases where it is demonstrated that another rule will better compute actual damages”
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marine Office of America Corp. v. Lilac Marine Corp.
the rule is not applied in cases where it is demonstrated that another rule will better compute actual damages
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Estate of Baldassarre
“For instance, civil contempt sanctions sometimes consist of a fine for each day a violation of a court order continues.” Id. at 46-47 ; see Madden v. Grain Elevator, Flour & Feed Mill Workers, International Longshoreman Ass’n, Local 418, 334 F.2d 1014 , 1017, 1020 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967 (1965); see generally Spallone v. United States, 493 U.S. 265 (1990); United States v. Barnett, 330 F.2d 369 (5th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Estate of Baldassarre
“For instance, civil contempt sanctions sometimes consist of a fine for each day a violation of a court order continues.” Id. at 46-47 ; see Madden v. Grain Elevator, Flour & Feed Mill Workers, International Longshoreman Ass’n, Local 418, 334 F.2d 1014 , 1017, 1020 (7th Cir. -8 2018 IL App (2d) 170996 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967 (1965); see generally Spallone v. United States, 493 U.S. 265 (1990); United States v. Barnett, 330 F.2d 369 (5th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate v. Erhardt
"For instance, civil contempt sanctions sometimes consist of a fine for each day a violation of a court order continues." Id. at 46-47 , 146 Ill.Dec. 441 , 558 N.E.2d 404 ; see Madden v. Grain Elevator, Flour & Feed Mill Workers, International Longshoremen Ass'n, Local 418 , 334 F.2d 1014 , 1017, 1020 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied , 379 U.S. 967 , 85 S.Ct. 661 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965) ; see generally *290 *178 Spallone v. United States , 493 U.S. 265 , 110 S.Ct. 625 , 107 L.Ed.2d 644 (1990) ; United States v. Barnett , 330 F.2d 369 (5th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Estate of Baldassarre
“For instance, civil contempt sanctions sometimes consist of a fine for each day a violation of a court order continues.” Id. at 46-47 ; see Madden v. Grain Elevator, Flour & Feed Mill Workers, International Longshoreman Ass’n, Local 418, 334 F.2d 1014 , 1017, 1020 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967 (1965); see generally Spallone v. United States, 493 U.S. 265 (1990); United States v. Barnett, 330 F.2d 369 (5th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berger v. Heckler
See Madden v. Grain Elevator, Flour and Feed Mill Workers, Local 418, 334 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967 , 85 S.Ct. 661 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965). 18 68 Ensuring compliance with a prior order is an equitable goal which a court is empowered to pursue even absent a finding of contempt.
discussed
Cited "see"
Berger v. Heckler
See Madden v. Grain Elevator, Flour and Feed Mill Workers, Local 418, 334 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1964), ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 967 , 85 S.Ct. 661 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965). 18 Ensuring compliance with a prior order is an equitable goal which a court is empowered to pursue even absent a finding of contempt.
discussed
Cited "see"
Scar v. Commissioner
(2×)
Accord, Allen v. David, 334 F.2d 592, 601 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 967 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Metzger Trust v. Commissioner
(2×)
Accord, Allen v. David, 334 F.2d 592, 601 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 967 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allied International, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio
(2×)
See Madden v. Grain Elevator Workers Local 418, 334 F.2d 1014 (CA7 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967 , 85 S.Ct. 661 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965); Grain Elevator Workers Local 418 v. NLRB, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 219 , 376 F.2d 774 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 932 , 88 S.Ct. 296 , 19 L.Ed.2d 285 (1967)." 419 U.S. at 225 n.10, 95 S.Ct. at 415 n.10.
discussed
Cited "see"
Baldovin v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
See Madden v. Grain Elevator, Flour and Feed Mill Workers, International Longshoremen Association, Local 418, 334 F.2d 1014 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967 , 85 S.Ct. 661 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965); Grain Elevator, Flour and Feed Mill Workers, International Longshoremen Association, Local 418 v. NLRB, 376 F.2d_774 (D.C.Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 932 , 88 S.Ct. 296 , 19 L.Ed.2d 285 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis v. Baldovin, Jr., Regional Director of Region 23 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Defendants- Curtis L. MacK Regional Director of Region 10 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Defendants
See Madden v. Grain Elevator, Flour and Feed Mill Workers, International Longshoremen Association, Local 418, 334 F.2d 1014 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967 , 85 S.Ct. 661 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965); Grain Elevator, Flour and Feed Mill Workers, International Longshoremen Association, Local 418 v. NLRB, 376 F.2d 774 (D.C.Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 932 , 88 S.Ct. 296 , 19 L.Ed.2d 285 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Radio Ass'n v. Mobile Steamship Ass'n
(2×)
See Madden v. Grain Elevator Workers Local 418, 334 F. 2d 1014 (CA7 1964), cert. denied, 379 U. S. 967 (1965); Grain Elevator Workers Local 418 v. NLRB, 126 U. S. App. D.
cited
Cited "see"
Walker v. Miller
See Allen v. David, 334 F.2d 592, 599 (5th Cir. 1964, cert. den. 379 U.S. 967 , 85 S.Ct. 660 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 ); Haas v. Earley, supra; Ellison v. Knapek, 421 S.W.2d 474 (Tex.Civ.App.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Baldridge
See Deck v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 240 , 339 F.2d 739 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967 , 85 S.Ct. 660 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965); United States v. Zakutansky, 68-1 U.S.T.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pizzo
See Deck v. United States, 339 F.2d 739 (D.C.Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967 , 85 S.Ct. 660 , 13 L.Ed. 2d 560 (1965); Boushor v. United States, 316 F.2d 451, 456 (8th Cir. 1963); In re Fahey, 300 F.2d 383 (6th Cir. 1961), affirming 192 F.Supp. 492 (W.D.Ky.1961); Sale v. United States, 228 F.2d 682 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1006 , 76 S.Ct. 650 , 100 L.Ed. 868 (1956); United States v. Boccuto, 175 F.Supp. 886 (D.N.J.), appeal dismissed, 274 F.2d 860 (3rd Cir. 1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Allen
v.
David
v.
David
No. 619.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
Leon Jaworski for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondents.
Published
Citer courts: D. Puerto Rico (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.