green
Positive treatment
Issue: specificity requirementNC ↗
Issue: particularity requirementNC ↗
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Blazic v. Ford Motor Company
See City of El Paso v. Simmons (1965), 379 US 497 ( 85 S Ct 577 , 13 L Ed 2d 446 ), rehearing denied 380 US 926 ( 85 S Ct 879 , 13 L Ed 2d 813 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kufrovich
See, e.g., Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476, 485 , 85 S.Ct. 506, 512 , 13 L.Ed.2d 431 (1965), reh’g denied, 380 U.S. 926 , 85 S.Ct. 879 , 13 L.Ed.2d 813 (1965) (holding that the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment must be “accorded the most scrupulous exactitude when the ‘things’ are books, and the basis for their seizure is the ideas which they contain.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saldana v. State
(2×)
See also Stanford v. State of Texas, 379 U.S. 476 , 85 S.Ct. 506 , 13 L.Ed.2d 431 , reh'g denied, 380 U.S. 926 , 85 S.Ct. 879 , 13 L.Ed.2d 813 (1965); Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 , reh'g denied, 368 U.S. 871 , 82 S.Ct. 23 , 7 L.Ed.2d 72 (1961); Wolf v. People of State of Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 , 69 S.Ct. 1359 , 93 L.Ed. 1782 (1949).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kolinske v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
See, e.g., Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 559, 564, 574 , 85 S.Ct. 476, 480, 485 , 13 L.Ed.2d 487 reh’g denied, 380 U.S. 926 , 85 S.Ct. 879 , 13 L.Ed.2d 814 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Turkal
See also Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476 , 85 S.Ct. 506 , 13 L.Ed.2d 431 (1965), rehearing denied, 380 U.S. 926 , 85 S.Ct. 879 , 13 L.Ed.2d 813 (1965); United States v. LaVallee, 391 F.2d 123 (2nd Cir. 1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Brown
v.
Brown
No. 63.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1965.
Dana Latham on the motion.
Cited by 37 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 377
U. S. 962.) Motion of Dana Latham for leave to participate in oral argument, as counsel for amici curiae, denied.