green
Positive treatment
Issue: double jeopardy clauseNJ ↗
Issue: speedy trial violationNJ ↗
Issue: availability defenseNJ ↗
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Barnes
But see State v. Farmer, 48 N.J. 145, 168 (1966), cert. den., 386 U.S. 991 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed.2d 335 (1967) (despite language difference in state and federal constitution double jeopardy clauses, clauses are coextensive in application).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Modell
See State v. Farmer, 48 N.J. 145, 171 , 224 A. 2d 481 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 991 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 335 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Hakeem v. Beyer
See State v. Farmer, 48 N.J. 145, 168 , 224 A.2d 481 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 991 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed.2d 335 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
State ex rel. L.D.
Accord, State v. Farmer, 48 N.J. 145, 169-170 (1966), cert. den. 386 U.S. 991 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed.2d 335 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
State, in Interest of Ld
Accord, State v. Farmer, 48 N.J. 145, 169-170 (1966), cert. den. 386 U.S. 991 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 335 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Klein
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, for example, State v. Farmer, 48 N.J. 145, 152 (1966), cert. den. 386 U.S. 991 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 335 (1967); State v. Clement, supra ; State v. Moffa, supra ; State v. Mucci, 25 N.J. 423 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Higgins
See State v. Farmer, 48 N.J. 145 (1966), cert. den. 386 U.S. 991 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed. 2 d 335 (1967); Note, "Double Jeopardy: The Reprosecution Problem," 77 Harv.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Rhein
See State v. Farmer, 48 N.J. 145, 169 (1966), cert. den. 386 U.S. 991 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed.2d 335 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Henley
See State v. Farmer (1966), 48 NJ 145 ( 224 A2d 481 ), cert. den. (1967), 386 US 991 ( 87 S Ct 1305 , 18 L Ed 2d 335 ); United States v. DiFronzo (CA 7,1965), 345 F2d 383, cert. den. (1965), 382 US 829 ( 86 S Ct 67 , 15 L Ed 2d 74 ); Vaccaro v. United States (CA 5, 1966), 360 F2d 606; McKissick v. United States (CA 5, 1968), 398 F2d 342; United States v. Maroney (CA 3, 1968), 404 F2d 233, cert. den. 394 US 949 ( 89 S Ct 1287 , 22 LEd 2d 483).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Richardson
Consequently, courts have determined that where the refund anticipation loan fails to comply with the Assignment of Claims Act, the creditor’s claims against the United States Government are invalid, but “no court has nullified an assignment as between the individual private parties simply because it failed to comply with the statute.” See R & L Refunds, Inc., 96 B.R. at 107 ; see also In re Danning v. Mintz, 367 F.2d 304 (9th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 990 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed.2d 335 (1967)(noncompliance with Assignment of Claims Act does not affect validity of assignment as…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ambassador Factors, Division Fleet Factors Corp. v. First American Bulk Carrier Corp. (In re Topgallant Lines, Inc.)
See also Danning v. Mintz, 367 F.2d 304 (9th Cir.1966), cert. denied 386 U.S. 990 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed.2d 335 (1967) (Where the government was not exposed to the threat of multiple claims as the claim had already been paid and the government’s liability was at an end, the statute was inapplicable as it was for the protection of the government and not for the regulation of an assignment between private parties); In re Lagerstrom, supra. (Where debtor assigned his income tax refund to his bankruptcy attorney for legal services and bankruptcy trustee sought a declaration that the assignmen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Topgallant Lines, Inc.
See also Danning v. Mintz, 367 F.2d 304 (9th Cir.1966), cert. denied 386 U.S. 990 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed.2d 335 (1967) (Where the government was not exposed to the threat of multiple claims as the claim had already been paid and the government's liability was at an end, the statute was inapplicable as it was for the protection of the government and not for the regulation of an assignment between private parties); In re Lagerstrom, supra .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. CPS Chemical Co., Inc.
See, e.g., State v. Farmer, 45 N.J. 520 (1965), cert. den. 386 U.S. 991 , 87 S.Ct. 1305 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 335 (1967); State v. Clement, 40 N.J. 139 (1963); State v. Moffa, 36 N.J. 219 (1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Farmer
v.
New Jersey
v.
New Jersey
No. 1071.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 10, 1967.
Raymond A. Brown and Irving I. Vogelman for petitioner. J. Norris Harding for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Cfr. N. J. Certiorari denied.