green
Positive treatment
Doctrinal family: Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance C… ↗
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.6 score
“whatever need there may be to show reliance in other situations , we regard it as unnecessary in the limited instance when no volitional act is required and the result of a forced sale is exactly that intended by the wrongdoer”
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,447 S. William Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
But see Braasch v. Goldschmidt, 41 Del.Ch. 519, 524 , 199 A.2d 760 , 764 (Ch.1964) 2 See note 1 supra 3 Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 634 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); Popkin v. Bishop, 464 F.2d 714 , 718 n. 8 (2d Cir. 1972) 4 Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., supra, at 635 5 See Stauffer v. Standard Brands Inc., 40 Del.Ch. 202 , 178 A.2d 311, 314 (Ch.1962), aff'd, 41 Del.Ch. 7 , 187 A.2d 78 (Sup.Ct.1962) 6 See note 1 supra 7 Of course, the separate position of Morgan Stanley & Co. was not even discussed by Judge Brieant in his opin…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,033 James L. Shores, Jr., as of the Estate of Clarence E. Bishop, Jr., Etc. v. Jerald H. Sklar
whatever need there may be to show reliance in other situations , we regard it as unnecessary in the limited instance when no volitional act is required and the result of a forced sale is exactly that intended by the wrongdoer
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sampson v. Ampex Corporation
Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 632 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 *246 (1967); 9 Moore’s Federal Practice f[ 204.12[1], at 951 § n. 6.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hirsh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
In Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S- Ct. 463, 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967), defendants, by fraudulent misrepresentation obtained 95% of the shares of Crown Finance Co., Inc., and executed a short form merger.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. Regal Cruises, Ltd.
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 636-37 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967) (affirming denial of leave to amend where facts known to plaintiff from outset and plaintiff awaiting outcome of motion to dismiss before seeking leave).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beale v. Edgemark Financial Corp.
See Ray v. Karris, 780 F.2d 636 , 640 fn. 1 (7th Cir.1985) citing Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 634 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967). 1 For purposes of this motion for class certification, Beale’s standing as a “forced seller” has been unchallenged by Defendants and this fact alone means that at least part of Beale’s claim is typical of those of other class members.
cited
Cited "see"
Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman
See Shivers v. Amerco, 670 F.2d at 830 (discussing Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967)).
cited
Cited "see"
Koppel v. Wien
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Hershfang v. Knotter
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 476 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bolton v. Gramlich
McDaniel v. Dudley, 404 U.S. 858 , 92 S.Ct. 109 , 30 L.Ed.2d 101 (1971); see Vine v. Beneficial Finance Corp., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
L. D. Schreiber Cheese Co. v. Clearfield Cheese Co.
In determining when the granting of an amendment would be potentially prejudicial courts are frequently guided by the following considerations: the good faith of the party seeking the amendment; see Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (2d Cir. 1967); Danzy v. Johnson, 417 F.Supp. 426 , aff’med, 3 Cir., 582 F.2d 1273 (E.D.Pa.1976), the extent to which there has been an undue delay in proffering the amendment; see, e. g., Izaak Walton League of America v. St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Niederhoffer, Cross & Zeckhauser, Inc. v. Telstat Systems Inc.
Corp., 382 U.S. 172 , 86 S.Ct. 347 , 15 L.Ed.2d 247 (1965); Escalera v. New York City Housing Authority, 425 F.2d 853, 857 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 853 , 91 S.Ct. 54 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970); see Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Rothstein v. Seidman & Seidman
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 634 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Molasky v. Garfinkle
See Iroquois Industries, Inc. v. Syracuse China Corp., 417 F.2d 963, 969 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 909 , 90 S.Ct. 2199 , 26 L.Ed.2d 561 (1970). . 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967) ; see Dudley v. Southeastern Factor & Finance Corp., 446 F.2d 303 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 858 , 92 S.Ct. 109 , 30 L.Ed.2d 101 (1971) ; Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 798 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S. Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970) ; Feldberg v. O’Connell, 338 F.Supp. 744 (D.Mass.1972). . 375 F…
discussed
Cited "see"
Goodall v. Columbia Ventures, Inc.
See, Vine v. Beneficial Finance Corp., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967) ; Mutual Shares Corp. v. Genesco, Inc., 384 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1967) ; Crane v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970). 19 .
cited
Cited "see"
Dopp v. Franklin National Bank
Corp., 382 U.S. 172 , 86 S.Ct. 347 , 15 L.Ed.2d 247 (1965); see Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 - 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
John S. Kirby, D/B/A Quik-Chek of Indiana and Quik-Chek, Inc. v. P. R. Mallory & Co., Inc.
Accord, Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., Inc., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1967), cert, den., 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); Fowler v. Sponge Products Corp., 246 F.2d 223 (1st Cir. 1957); Eisenmann v. Gould-National Batteries, Inc., 169 F.Supp. 862 (E.D.Pa.1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co.
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 630-657 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Landy v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir. 1965), cert, denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967) 1 "It has been held that an appellate court cannot know judicially what transpired in the cause throughout its long history.
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,549 Irwin Popkin v. Warner B. Bishop
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Knauff v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, 2 Cir., 374 F.2d 627, 634 , cert. denied 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 .
cited
Cited "see"
Knauff v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, 2 Cir., 374 F.2d 627, 634 , cert. denied 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Briarpatch Ltd., LP v. Geisler Roberdeau, Inc.
See, e.g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 637 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Endicott Johnson Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney, 489 U.S. at 179 , 109 S.Ct. at 993 ; see, e.g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 632 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967) (applying Thompson where appellant filed untimely postjudgment motion, that, if timely, would have tolled the running of the 30-day period, because district court then held the untimely motion sub judice for two weeks, until the 30-day period for an appeal had expired).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dower v. Mosser Industries, Inc.
See e. g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 633-36 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); Vaiente v. PepsiCo, Inc., 454 F.Supp. 1228, 1236-37 (D.Del.1978); 2 A. Bromberg Securities Law; Fraud § 6.3 at 122.17 (1977). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation
(2×)
See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967). 18 Thus, the complaint completes the showing necessary to state a claim under Rule 10b-5.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle Mize
See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 2 Cir. 1967, 374 F.2d 627, 637 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,125 Sue Ellen Baker James v. Gerber Products Company, the Old State Bank of Fremont
See, e. g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (standing granted since shareholder was forced to sell his shares at a later time); A. T.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Green v. Wolf Corp.
See, e. g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 637 (2d Cir.) cert, denied 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,474 Morton Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc. And Ellias C. Hoppenfeld, Blair & Co., Granbery Marache Incorporated, and Third-Party v. Paul Wiener, Third-Party
See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., Inc., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); Mutual Shares Corp. v. Genesco Inc., 384 F.2d 540, 544 (2d Cir. 1967); Barnett v. Anaconda Co., 238 F.Supp. 766, 776 (S.D.N.Y.1965); 6 Loss, supra, at 3880-3881. 54 Appellants also argue that the court distorted the question of causation by ruling that the schedule which the parties agreed would govern the amount of compensatory damages suffered assuming liability was proven, estopped defendants from contending that Globus (and perhaps others) suffered …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bokat v. Getty Oil Company
See, also, Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, 374 F.2d 627 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 460 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.
See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., Inc., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); Mutual Shares Corp. v. Genesco Inc., 384 F.2d 540, 544 (2d Cir. 1967); Barnett v. Anaconda Co., 238 F.Supp. 766, 776 (S.D.N.Y. 1965); 6 Loss, supra, at 3880-3881.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,413 John D. Condon v. Coyn Richardson
See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); cf. Ruckle v. Roto American Corp., 339 F.2d 24 (2nd Cir. 1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neville v. Delta Insurance
See, e. g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 252 F.Supp. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 1966) aff’d in part, rev’d in part 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 ; 3A Moore’s ¶ 23.13.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America Ex Rel. James Edward Hill v. Warren Pinto, Superintendent New Jersey State Prison Farm, Rahway, New Jersey
See Tate v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 13 , 283 F.2d 377 (1960); Bailey v. United States, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 328 F.2d 542 , cert. denied, 377 U.S. 972 , 84 S.Ct. 1655 , 12 L.Ed.2d 741 (1964); Inge v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 6 , 356 F.2d 345 (1966); see also Harrison v. United States, 387 F.2d 203, 212-214 (D.C.Cir.), cert. granted, 389 U.S. 969 , 88 S.Ct. 495 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967), involving the admission of testimony of a defendant given at a prior trial at which he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. 11 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Glona
v.
American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.
v.
American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.
No. 639.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1967.
Benjamin E. Smith for petitioner., Frank S. Normann for respondents.
Cited by 214 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted and case set for oral argument immediately following No. 508 (see ante, p. 925).