green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.2 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“documents submitted incident to a letter of credit are to be strictly construed”
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Courtaulds North America, Inc. v. North Carolina National Bank, a National Banking Association
But see Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., 385 F.2d 230, 234 (1 Cir. 1967), cert. denied 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 (1968).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Exotic Traders Far East Buying Office v. Exotic Trading U.S.A., Inc.
documents submitted incident to a letter of credit are to be strictly construed
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers, Local Union No. 34 v. General Pipe Covering, Inc.
e would be in a state of anarchy if the parties ... could avoid decisions by the simple process of taking their dolls and going home
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See State v. Boehme, 71 Wn.2d 621, 637 , 430 P.2d 527 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S. Ct. 1259 , 20 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Boston Hides & Furs, Ltd. v. Sumitomo Bank, Ltd.
The inconsistent trailer numbers were a “technical variance,” Exotic Traders, 717 F.Supp. at 16 ; See Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., 385 F.2d 230 (1st Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 (1968); Flagship Cruises, 569 F.2d at 705 , regarding a matter which was not required under the terms of the Letter of Credit and which could not mislead the Banks to their detriment. 4 The Banks’ principal argument is that, “if the ‘marks and numbers’ identifying the goods on the [Presentment Bills of Lading] did not match the ‘mark…
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. S & S Screw MacHine Company, Inc.
See NLRB v. Louisville Chair Co., 385 F.2d 922, 926 (6th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 (1968); NLRB v. Hecks, Inc., 369 F.2d 370, 371 (6th Cir.1966) (per curiam); NLRB v. Globe-Warnicke Systems Co., 336 F.2d 589, 590 (6th Cir.1964) (order). 3 It therefore is ORDERED that the application for enforcement of the above order of the Board is granted.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Gerace Construction Company, Inc.
See NLRB v. Louisville Chair Co., 385 F.2d 922, 926 (6th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 (1968); NLRB v. Hecks, Inc., 369 F.2d 370, 371 (6th Cir.1966) (per curiam); NLRB v. Globe-Warnicke Systems Co., 336 F.2d 589, 590 (6th Cir.1964) (order granting summary enforcement).
cited
Cited "see"
Bartosch v. Lewison
See Gladden v. P. Henderson & Co., 385 F.2d 480, 484 (3rd Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1262 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colgate Palmolive Company v. S/s Dart Canada, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., Dart Containerline Ltd., Global Terminal & Container Services, Inc., Lansdell Protective Agency, Inc., Global Terminal & Container Services, Inc., Lansdell Protective Agency, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Third-Party
Accord, Carle & Montanari, Inc. v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, 275 F.Supp. 76 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem. 386 F.2d 839 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1968). 7 Having said that nothing in COGSA or its legislative history precludes parties from agreeing to extend its coverage to situations other than those where it would normally apply, it does not follow that any such resulting contractual provision is necessarily valid.
discussed
Cited "see"
Colgate Palmolive Co. v. S/S Dart Canada
Accord, Carle & Montanari, Inc. v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, 275 F.Supp. 76 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d mem. 386 F.2d 839 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mines
(2×)
(Italics ours.) Department of Social & Health Servs. v. Latta, 92 Wn.2d 812 , 819, 601 P.2d 520 (1979); see State v. Boehme, 71 Wn.2d 621, 635 , 430 P.2d 527 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 20 L.
cited
Cited "see"
George Lange v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
See Gladden v. P. Henderson & Co., 385 F.2d 480 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1262 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cuvrell (In Re F & T Contractors, Inc.)
See Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, 385 F.2d 230 (1st Cir. 1967) cert. den. 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 ; Dynamics Corporation of America v. Citizens and Southern National Bank, 356 F.Supp. 991 (N.D.Ga.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
June Hannah v. Bill Haskins, D/B/A Cloverleaf Fertilizer Company and Dwayne Elvin Bentley, Kirk National Leasing Co., Inc
See Gladden v. P. Henderson & Co., 385 F.2d 480, 483-84 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1262 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
First National Bank v. Wynne
Bank of Boston, 569 F2d 699, 705, supra; Accord, Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., 385 F2d 230, 237, supra, cert. den. 390 U.S. 1013 ; Venizelos, S.A. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 425 F2d 461, supra. We find the documents submitted by the beneficiary-plaintiff to the issuer defendant to be in compliance with the conditions of the letter of credit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bossier Bank & Trust Co. v. Union Planters National Bank
See Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, 385 F.2d 230 (1st Cir. 1967) cert. den. 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 ; Dynamics Corporation of America v. Citizens and Southern National Bank, 356 F.Supp. 991 (N.D.Ga.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bossier Bank & Trust Company v. Union Planters National Bank Of Memphis
See Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, 385 F.2d 230 (1st Cir. 1967) cert. den. 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 ; Dynamics Corporation of America v. Citizens and Southern National Bank, 356 F.Supp. 991 (N.D.Ga.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Toyomenka, Inc. v. S. S. Tosaharu Maru
See Carle & Montanari, Inc. v. American Export Inbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 275 F.Supp. 76 (S.D.N.Y.) aff’d, 386 F.2d 839 (2d Cir. 1967), cert denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Accord, NLRB v. Louisville Chair Co., 385 F.2d 922, 925 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1264 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, Chemical Division v. National Labor Relations Board
Accord, NLRB v. Louisville Chair Co., 385 F.2d 922, 925 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1264 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 11 Local 872, International Longshoremen's Association, 163 NLRB 586 (1967); Local 1351, Steamship Clerks, etc. v. NLRB, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 304 , 329 F.2d 259 (1964), cert. denied, Houston Maritime Assn. v. NLRB, 377 U.S. 993 , 84 S.Ct. 1921 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1046 12 Chemrock Corp., 151 NLRB 1074 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kotler v. NAT. RR PASSENGER CORP.
Co., 703 F. 2d 322, 324 (8th Cir.1983) (citation omitted); see also Gladden v. P. Henderson & Co., 385 F. 2d 480, 483-84 (3rd Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1262 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 162 (1968), holding collateral source benefits evidence admissible to rebut the plaintiff's testimony that he was compelled to return to work early because he was in financially dire straits.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Corsetti v. Stone Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Gladden v. P. Henderson & Co., 385 F.2d 480 (3d Cir. 1967), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 1013 (1968) (plaintiff testified he returned to work because he had fallen behind in the payment of his bills); Lange v. Missouri Pac.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rupp v. International Terminal Operating Co.
See also Carle & Montanari, Inc. v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 275 F.Supp. 76 (S.D.N.Y.1967), aff’d, 386 F.2d 839 (2 Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 (1968) (stevedore entitled to benefit of limitation where clause included “all agents and all stevedores and other independent contractors whatsoever”) . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bob's Casing Crews, Inc., Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross
See, e. g., NLRB v. Louisville Chair Co., 6 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 922 , cert. denied, 1968, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1264 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 ; NLRB v. City Yellow Cab Co., 6 Cir. 1965, 344 F.2d 575 ; NLRB v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co., 2 Cir. 1942, 130 F.2d 503 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carle & Montanari, Inc.
v.
John W. McGrath Corp.
v.
John W. McGrath Corp.
No. 1143.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 8, 1968.
F. Herbert Prem for petitioner. James M. Leonard and Martin J. McHugh for John W. McGrath Corp., and M. E. De Orchis for American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., respondents.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1) · D. Minnesota (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.