green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Cited for
Statutes must be read and construed together to give effect to both . . . .
- Citizens to Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Alabama Power Co., Am. Petroleum Inst., Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Co., Am. Paper Inst., Hoosier Energy Div., Mountain Fuel Supply Co., Montana Power Co., Nat. Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency N. Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, Nat. Resources Council of Maine, Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, the Bf Goodrich Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Hampton Roads Energy Co. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Env't Prot. Agency, N. Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, & Friends of the Earth v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, the Montana Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, N. Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Pittston Co., Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Indus., Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, the Pittston Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Am. Paper Inst. & the Nat'l Forest Prods. Ass'n v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Mfg. Chemists Ass'n, Chem. Prods. Corp., Dow Chem. Co., FMC Corp., Monsanto Co., PPG Indus., Inc., Rohm & Haas Co., Stauffer Chem. Co., Union Carbide Corp., Allied Chem. Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Alabama By-Prods. Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Koppers Co., Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r of Epa, Usm Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Epa, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979).published (Statutes must be read and construed together to give effect to both . . . .)
- Citizens to Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979).published (Statutes must be read and construed together to give effect to both . . . .)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“statutes must be read and construed together to give effect to both . . . .”
- Citizens to Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Alabama Power Co., Am. Petroleum Inst., Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Co., Am. Paper Inst., Hoosier Energy Div., Mountain Fuel Supply Co., Montana Power Co., Nat. Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency N. Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, Nat. Resources Council of Maine, Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, the Bf Goodrich Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Hampton Roads Energy Co. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Env't Prot. Agency, N. Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, & Friends of the Earth v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, the Montana Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, N. Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Pittston Co., Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Indus., Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, the Pittston Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Am. Paper Inst. & the Nat'l Forest Prods. Ass'n v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Mfg. Chemists Ass'n, Chem. Prods. Corp., Dow Chem. Co., FMC Corp., Monsanto Co., PPG Indus., Inc., Rohm & Haas Co., Stauffer Chem. Co., Union Carbide Corp., Allied Chem. Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Alabama By-Prods. Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Koppers Co., Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r of Epa, Usm Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Epa, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979).published “statutes must be read and construed together to give effect to both . . . .”
- Citizens to Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979).published “statutes must be read and construed together to give effect to both . . . .”
R.
v.
McGinnis Theatres & Pay T. V. Inc. v. Video Independent Theatres, Inc.
v.
McGinnis Theatres & Pay T. V. Inc. v. Video Independent Theatres, Inc.
No. 1175.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 8, 1968.
Published opinion
Milton Bordwin for petitioner. Edward E. Soulé and Stanley Godofsky for respondents Paramount Film Distributing Corp. et al., Coleman Hayes for respondent Video Independent Thea-tres, Inc., and Pat Malloy for respondent Delman Theatre Corp.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.