green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1979 ·
…statutes must be read and construed together to give effect to both . . . .
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
statutes must be read and construed together to give effect to both . . . .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edwards
See, e.g., United States v. Norman, 391 F.2d 212 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1014 , 88 S.Ct. 1265 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Harry Davis, D/B/A Davis Manufacturing Company v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Norman, (6th Cir. 1968) 391 F.2d 212 , cert. den. 390 U.S. 1014 , 88 S.Ct. 1265 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jendrusch
In light of these subsequent amendments, the present charge could not possibly support the defendant’s conviction. 4 Reversed and remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint. 1 Kaneshiro v. United States, 445 F.2d 1266 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. den. 404 U.S. 992; See also United States v. Norman, 391 F.2d 212 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 390 U.S. 1014 . 2 HRS § 702-206 contains definitions of the states of mind which the Hawaii Penal Code recognizes as sufficient to establish penal liability.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reyes Correa-Negron, AKA Ray Correa-Negron, Ray Correa, Sr. v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Norman, 6 Cir. 1968, 391 F.2d 212 , cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1014 , 88 S.Ct. 1265 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Mannex Corp. v. Prejean
See, also, Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Cocreham, 5 Cir. 1967, 382 F.2d 929 , 937 n. 16, cert. denied Moulton v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp., 390 U.S. 1014 , 88 S.Ct. 1264 , 20 L.Ed.2d 164 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
R.
v.
McGinnis Theatres & Pay T. V. Inc. v. Video Independent Theatres, Inc.
v.
McGinnis Theatres & Pay T. V. Inc. v. Video Independent Theatres, Inc.
No. 1175.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 8, 1968.
Milton Bordwin for petitioner. Edward E. Soulé and Stanley Godofsky for respondents Paramount Film Distributing Corp. et al., Coleman Hayes for respondent Video Independent Thea-tres, Inc., and Pat Malloy for respondent Delman Theatre Corp.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.