green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Cited for
[T]he interests of justice require that in a doubtful case ... any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action.
- State ex rel. McCaffery v. Hutchison, 585 S.E.2d 52 (W. Va. 2003).published ([T]he interests of justice require that in a doubtful case ... any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action.)
- In Re West Virginia Rezulin Litig., 585 S.E.2d 52 (W. Va. 2003).published ([T]he interests of justice require that in a doubtful case ... any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action.)
explaining that a court assessing the predominance and superiority requirements “is directed to weigh four non-exhaustive factors” (emphasis added)
- Frank Teta v. Michelle Chow, No. 12-40271 (5th Cir. Apr. 22, 2013).published(explaining that a court assessing the predominance and superiority requirements “is directed to weigh four non-exhaustive factors” (emphasis added))
- Teta v. Chow (In Re TWL Corp.), 712 F.3d 886 (5th Cir. 2013).published (explaining that a court assessing the predominance and superiority requirements "is directed to weigh four non-exhaustive factors" (emphasis added))
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“the interests of justice require that in a doubtful case ... any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action.”
- State ex rel. McCaffery v. Hutchison, 585 S.E.2d 52 (W. Va. 2003).published “the interests of justice require that in a doubtful case ... any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action.”
- In Re West Virginia Rezulin Litig., 585 S.E.2d 52 (W. Va. 2003).published “the interests of justice require that in a doubtful case ... any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action.”
Other citing cases
- Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust v. XTO Energy, Inc., 281 F.R.D. 477 (D. Kan. 2012).published
- Emig v. Am. Tobacco Co., 184 F.R.D. 379 (D. Kan. 1998).published
- Linton v. Shearson Lehman/Am. Express, Inc., 122 F.R.D. 424 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).published
- Dirks v. Clayton Brokerage Co., 105 F.R.D. 125 (D. Minn. 1985).published
- Masri v. Wakefield, 106 F.R.D. 322 (D. Colo. 1984).published
- Dahl v. Gardner, 583 F. Supp. 1262 (D. Utah 1984).published
- Kennedy v. Tallant, 710 F.2d 711 (11th Cir. 1983).published
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,428, 710 F.2d 711 (11th Cir. 1983).published
- Lewis v. Goldsmith, 95 F.R.D. 15 (D.N.J. 1982).published
- Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp., 89 F.R.D. 87 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).published
Show 26 more citing cases
- Neely v. United States, 546 F.2d 1059 (3d Cir. 1976).published
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,657 Richard Hudson Share v. Air Props. G. Inc., 538 F.2d 279 (9th Cir. 1976).published
- Chatman v. Barnes, 357 F. Supp. 9 (N.D. Okla. 1973).published
- Brown v. Brown, 492 P.2d 581 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971).published
- Lee J. Esplin, K. C. Weaver, Leo Reeve, Arthur Barlocker & Doyle Sampson v. Leland (Lee) Hirschi & Laverne Hirschi, William A. Barlocker v. Leland (Lee) Hirschi & Laverne Hirschi, Leland (Lee) Hirschi & Laverne Hirschi, Cross-Appellants v. Lee J. Esplin, K. C. Weaver, Leo Reeve, Arthur Barlocker, Doyle Sampson & William A. Barlocker, Cross-Appellees, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1969).published
- Pavement Salvage Co., Inc. v. Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc., 404 F.2d 450 (4th Cir. 1969).published
- Ripp v. Oklahoma Commc'ns Sys., 2023 OK CIV APP 3.published
- Ripp v. Oklahoma Commc'ns Sys., 525 P.3d 52 (Okla. Civ. App. 2022).published
- Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 922 A.2d 710 (N.J. 2007).published
- Langner v. Brown, 913 F. Supp. 260 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).published
- In re Carbon Dioxide Antitrust Litig., 149 F.R.D. 229 (M.D. Fla. 1993).published
- Antonson v. Robertson, 141 F.R.D. 501 (D. Kan. 1991).published
- Mularkey v. Holsum Bakery, Inc., 120 F.R.D. 118 (D. Ariz. 1988).published
- In re Storage Tech. Corp. Sec. Litig., 113 F.R.D. 113 (D. Colo. 1986).published
- Krome v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 637 F. Supp. 910 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).published
- Walsh v. Ford Motor Co., 106 F.R.D. 378 (D.D.C. 1985).published
- Brandon v. Chefetz, 106 A.D.2d 162 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1985).published
- Jordan v. Global Nat. Resources, Inc., 102 F.R.D. 45 (S.D. Ohio 1984).published
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,681, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,335, 663 F.2d 669 (6th Cir. 1981).published
- Herm v. Stafford, 663 F.2d 669 (6th Cir. 1981).published
- Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co., 92 F.R.D. 32 (E.D. Va. 1981).published
- Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp., 78 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1980).published
- In Re Beef Indus. Antitrust Litig., M. D. L. Docket No. 248. Meat Price Investigators Ass'n v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., & Farr Farms Co. & Farr Feeders, Inc., Darrell Cameron v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., & Farr Farms Co. & Farr Feeders, Inc., Don Ludvigson v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., & Farr Farms Co. & Farr Feeders, Inc., in Re Beef Indus. Antitrust Litig., M. D. L. No. 248. Meat Price Investigators Ass'n v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. Spencer Foods, Inc., Darrell Cameron v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. Spencer Foods, Inc., Don Ludvigson v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. Spencer Foods, Inc., in Re Beef Indus. Antitrust Litig., M. D. L. No. 248. Don Ludvigson v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. & Mbpxl Corp., 607 F.2d 167 (5th Cir. 1979).published
- Meat Price Investigators Ass'n v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 607 F.2d 167 (5th Cir. 1979).published
- Samuel v. Univ. of Pittsburgh, 506 F.2d 355 (3d Cir. 1974).published
- Fox v. Prudent Resources Trust, 382 F. Supp. 81 (E.D. Pa. 1974).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Esplin
v.
Hirschi et ux.
v.
Hirschi et ux.
No. 1013.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 24, 1969.
Published opinion
Hardin A. Whitney, Jr., for petitioners.
Granted, Should, White.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Citer courts: West Virginia Supreme Court (4)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice White is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.