green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Cited for
The case law in non-marine policies is generally consistent in disallowing interest in excess of the dollar policy limits unless the policy contains language which provides for interest.
- Steelmet, Inc. v. Caribe Towing Corp., 842 F.2d 1237 (11th Cir. 1988).published (The case law in non-marine policies is generally consistent in disallowing interest in excess of the dollar policy limits unless the policy contains language which provides for interest.)
- Steelmet, Inc., Cross-Appellant, Jarrell R. Jackson, Intervening v. Caribe Towing Corp., Marine Expl. Co., Inc., Third-Party v. Frank B. Hall & Co., Am. Marine Underwriters, Third-Party Calvert Fire Ins. Co., Third Party Cross- Alabama-Puerto Rico Barge Lines, Inc. v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co., 842 F.2d 1237 (3d Cir. 1988).published (The case law in non-marine policies is generally consistent in disallowing interest in excess of the dollar policy limits unless the policy contains language which provides for interest.)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“the case law in non-marine policies is generally consistent in disallowing interest in excess of the dollar policy limits unless the policy contains language which provides for interest.”
- Steelmet, Inc. v. Caribe Towing Corp., 842 F.2d 1237 (11th Cir. 1988).published “the case law in non-marine policies is generally consistent in disallowing interest in excess of the dollar policy limits unless the policy contains language which provides for interest.”
- Steelmet, Inc., Cross-Appellant, Jarrell R. Jackson, Intervening v. Caribe Towing Corp., Marine Expl. Co., Inc., Third-Party v. Frank B. Hall & Co., Am. Marine Underwriters, Third-Party Calvert Fire Ins. Co., Third Party Cross- Alabama-Puerto Rico Barge Lines, Inc. v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co., 842 F.2d 1237 (3d Cir. 1988).published “the case law in non-marine policies is generally consistent in disallowing interest in excess of the dollar policy limits unless the policy contains language which provides for interest.”
Other citing cases
- Louisiana Land & Expl. Co. v. Amoco Prod. Co., 878 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1989).published
- Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 450 F. Supp. 496 (D. Conn. 1978).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Underwriters at Lloyds London
v.
Alcoa Steamship Co., Inc.
v.
Alcoa Steamship Co., Inc.
No. 71-91.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1971.
Published opinion
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.